Screenshots - Includes 40 new images (page14)
- Thread starter kodos
- Start date
why are you guys blasting Criicket 2005 like this. If the game developers read this they probably will have less moitvation to make it better. PLus i dont understand this love for BLIC. yes they have been releaasing info for long but doesnt make the game better. Right now we can only see one thing that is graphics and in that department EA is blwoing Codemasters out of the water. BLIC is looking uglier than Cricket 2002. Player animations have always made cricket looked flawed, the best I ever saw was Cricket 96.
apesnani said:
Because people think (and have every right to) they have been cheated with previous EA Cricket games, we were told lies and they released what seemed to be a half finished game, yes Cricket 2005 graphics are better but i don't think graphics was the major problem in cricket 2004
:Why should we trust them again? im not saying it won't be any good but uno......
Last edited:
ajay2k5
Club Cricketer
I think its going to be a DUD, but it's cricket and I love the sport so I will buy it. Then complain abou it, on this forum most likely...
sohum
Executive member
And then patiently wait for the patchmakers to get busy. 
That is what the software life cycle is all about!
That is what the software life cycle is all about!ajay2k5
Club Cricketer
sohummisra said:And then patiently wait for the patchmakers to get busy.
unfortunatly for me I am a PS2 fan, so no patch for me. :help
sohum
Executive member
That sucks, for you. The only console I've ever owned is PSX and I played Cricket 2000 and Brian Lara Cricket 99 on it. Both games were not particularly brilliant efforts. I guess BLC was fun to an extent. But the graphics hurt my eyes.
sameer0807
Club Cricketer
Bill_Law_Dain said:Is they're any chance of Codemaster and Ea Sports to work togather
...Codemaster got the best gameplay and Ea Sports got the best graphics
If this happens we will get great graphics and great gameplay which equals to a great game
ya we wish!
ajay2k5
Club Cricketer
Hey does any notice anything similar to Cricket 2004 about this picture?
The batsman run past the wicket and stop EXACTLY the same as they did in Cricket 2004, which means there still using the same gameplay engine.
The batsman run past the wicket and stop EXACTLY the same as they did in Cricket 2004, which means there still using the same gameplay engine.
lazy_chesnut
International Coach
That's exactly what I said, though it may be in a different thread.
But I think everyone knows that this game will more than likely simply be Cricket 2004 with new graphics. Exactly like Rugby 2005 is Rugby 2004 with new graphics.
But I think everyone knows that this game will more than likely simply be Cricket 2004 with new graphics. Exactly like Rugby 2005 is Rugby 2004 with new graphics.
ajay2k5
Club Cricketer
Yeah it does, they ran past the wicket like 2004, they stand the same way as 2004, and the holding of the bat is pretty much the same, slightly different because of the new graphics engine.
sohum
Executive member
Obviously that is an over-generalization. A new engine does not mean that they need to change every aspect of gameplay. Why change something that is fine? The position that the batsmen had after running was not bad in anyway so it makes perfect sense to leave it as it is. That's like saying all sodas are the same because the bottles are shaped the same way.
