Am I the only one who wouldn't be bothered about waiting those extra couple of minutes for snicko?
I don't see how a "can't tell" decision could work like that, it's just too vague. Not only could you hear a nick, but the seam rotation was different after passing the bat. I didn't see anything on Hotspot, but it isn't the best on small edges, which is where Snicko comes in, I say wait for it. Test cricket has to adapt, for that time lost, make it the drinks break, or take time out of Lunch/Tea. Flexibility is needed.
People can blame DRS, but it's only as useful as the person on the end of it interpreting it. As with many similar technologies.
Ultimately, I say wait for snicko and get the game to move quicker, the amount of faffing the Sri Lankan batsman was doing was ridiculous. It's about time the ICC take a tougher stance on over rates and actually starting to penalise teams who fail to meet the over rate target (which would be a changeable target in relation to injuries/DRS, etc) which should be a base of 15 an hour.