Stuart broad has recently been doing various unprofessional things, distracting the batsman being one of them. No wonder his dad's not the match referee when he is playing.must be a disgrace.there also has been an off field controversy with graeme swann i guess. I'm not sure. Stuart broad is not a good professional. That's for sure.
Riiiiiight. So, batsmen can shuffle about in their crease, switch hit and make the bowler pull away from his run up, but the bowler can't bloody
point?? Even the pundits on TV agreed that the ruling was BS. As for Stuart Broad not being a good professional? He's on course to become an extremely useful all rounder for England. You quite obviously haven't got the faintest idea of what you're on about, have you?
Anyway, back to the match. Huge mistake by us not to go in with a hitter down the order and why isn't Napier being given a chance? Can't remember who it was against, but I saw him play the most explosive Twenty20 innings I've seen and I remember thinking 'hope he plays for England'! Still, England were much improved at Twenty20 in this tournament, especially the bowling side. Batting needs work in the middle overs; how many balls was it between boundaries at one point? You just can't do that in Twenty20.
MasterBlaster76 added 2 Minutes and 23 Seconds later...
For the Windies?
If anything it was harsh on England. In T20 cricket I don't feel there should be rain reduced games, it just turns into a farce.
Agreed. I mean, there are floodlights for God's sake! Why make these retarded regulations that the match
has to end at a certain time? I'm sure the fans would rather see a whole match even if it does mean staying a bit late and I would've loved to have seen what the outcome would've been had it been a full twenty overs, because the fact is, our bowling in the first five or six overs was magnificent.
Now, bring on the Ashes, we're better at Test cricket anyway.
Good luck Windies in the semis.