I feel like I'm banging my head to a wall. I can't do this discussion with you anymore. Adios
Wow that is just wow. Thats why i asked him to provide a link to the poll he was referring to but instead he started giving stupid stats like Inzy had more Half Centuries than Sachin. WTH dude, thats not something to write home about. He had more 50s coz his conversion rate was poor.
Hmmm.... I think you guys seriously need some brain and logic to post comments about Cricket. Read the words clearly, I said that Inzamam was Nominated in that List, I didn't say He won that category.
Plus, Don't tell me what kind of Indian fans are and we should rather not start this Indian fans vs Pakistan fans debate.
As far as Conversion rate is concerned, Thats just shows another lame and uneducated comment about this issue.
Inzamam used to bat at Number 4 and Number 5 Mostly, And Plenty of times, He couldn't complete the century and complete his half centuries even because of that, Otherwise He would be Miles ahead of Tendulkar in terms of Half Centuries atleast.
Tendulkar does have an art to make a Hundred well, but what's the use of that art if that superb art is not making his team win???
There is a famous saying about him, Whenever he does Hundred, India Loses.
I better not want to involve in this VS Discussion. But seriously, read clearly before posting comments.
Cheers
Hmmm.... I think you guys seriously need some brain and logic to post comments about Cricket. Read the words clearly, I said that Inzamam was Nominated in that List, I didn't say He won that category.
Plus, Don't tell me what kind of Indian fans are and we should rather not start this Indian fans vs Pakistan fans debate.
As far as Conversion rate is concerned, Thats just shows another lame and uneducated comment about this issue.
Inzamam used to bat at Number 4 and Number 5 Mostly, And Plenty of times, He couldn't complete the century and complete his half centuries even because of that, Otherwise He would be Miles ahead of Tendulkar in terms of Half Centuries atleast.
Tendulkar does have an art to make a Hundred well, but what's the use of that art if that superb art is not making his team win???
There is a famous saying about him, Whenever he does Hundred, India Loses.
I better not want to involve in this VS Discussion. But seriously, read clearly before posting comments.
Cheers
OMG you Indian fans are dilapidated, arrogant fools who are some what deranged, mentioning Sharma in the same breath as Wasim and Waqar. I like how all you Indian fans like ganging up on Pakistani fans on these forums and the moment the strike back you all start moaning and crying and using foul language. As Rehan said, it was a NOMINATION....sorry if you can't read English. Secondly, Pakistani fans always give credit where credit is due and no one will deny Tnedulkar is a great batsman, if not the greatest, but this is not a Inzy versus other batsmen discussion. It is a discussion about who individuals believe to be the best players of the last decade. Someone mentioned Brett Lee was more useful than Murali, i find that absurd but I respect that individuals opinions. May be the Indians should learn some lessons from that, lessons that the arrogant and completely self obsessed BCCI could seriously learn, trying to drag cricket back to the dark ages with their corruption, bookies involvement, which your own media keeps telling us about and refusal to use UDRS....absurd. And I remember someone saying that Pakistan has not produced great batsmen so we go on about Inzamam, erm...have you forgotten Zaheer Abbas and Javed Miandad? In fact, Miandad is one of only two batsmen in test history who never once averaged below 50 throughout his career, having to bat against the likes of Lillee, Hadlee, Botham, Holding, Garner, Marshall and co. So try not be so ignorant next time. Just thought I would also mention Imran Khan, who averaged over 50 in the last ten years of his Test career, all the while captaining one of the hardest teams to captain, being the only team to never lose to the Windies in that time. Peace
OMG if Inzamam can be in league of Sachin, Lara then why not Ishant sharma.But you have a history of getting humilated . So you have become shameless now.
And Inzamam was nominated because he scored 10000 runs. Not because he was an ATG batsman.
And why don't you solve your own mess in which Pakistan cricket is now. Only a mentally retarded team will have Afridi as captain. And don't you know Pakistan cricket funds terrorist otherwise why would Javed Miandad marry his son with Dawood Ibrahim's daughter who he is a well known terrorist. PCB is begging to BCCI to play.
Yes Imran khan was so good with the bat in last 10 years that he never reached in the top 10 batsmen ICC rankings.
And have you checked the average of Miandad against West Indies.
So please keep your delusions to yourself. Win a test series against top teams. A fraud team with cheat cricketers and deluded fans.
The inferiority complexity is amazing.
India is only this good because they have money. The ICC (Indian Cricket Council) is run by India and not fairly. No doubt that Sachin is good, but he is not amazing. There are many batsmen that are better than him but don't get the due respect. Inzamam is a class player. He may be fat, but he was amazing. We are country that start of trends. Who invented Reverse Swing, Who has one of the fastest bowlers in the world, Who learned how to play Mendis first, Who hit the last ball for a six in Sharjah, Who scored the fastest hundred, the quickest ball. Wait a minute none of them are India. The reason probably is because copy other people. They have money and boast. Which one of your bowlers can bowl over 90 mph at the age of 36. Hang on a min, You young bowlers can't even hit 90mph.
What was that about Afridi being a mental captain. Atleast your captain does win because of Luck. India is a nice team. Batsmen are good but your bowling dep is worse than Netherlands. We are a balanced side. We play proper cricket not politics.
Try to learn that India is a cricket team that only won a world cup because it was fixed. Why could Pakistan not chase down the total of just 260. FIXED. Why did England not win the game when the chased 320. Because the game was FIXED. Money isn't everything. Learn and get some quality.
You Indian fans are dilapidated, arrogant and ignorant fools. Do you know the quality Waqar, Wasim and Imran Khan were. They weren't 7 foot tall freaks. They were average height normal players that could swing the ball. Apart from Zaheer Khan. Who in your team can bowl well. Mr Turban can turn the ball. So he fires it in.
It time you people learned that both teams are good but the legends can't be replaced. Sachin is soooo over rated. He is good but not excellent.
ICC makes all the decision (Indian cricket league) That's why you win everything.
Why are Pakistani players not in the IPL. Wait they were in the first IPL. Who has the best bowling in the IPL. Can't be Sohail Tanvir 6-14. You guys are selfish and don't want the Pakistani to show there real talent so you don't buy them.
Sachin Tendulkar is an incredible batsman. Unless you can't wake up to reality, why would you make such a statement. He's achieved more than any player of this generation(statistically and otherwise) and is truly one of the best batsman of this era
Okay.. and let's see what India has done? J Srinath - 156Kmph
Uh.. Imran Khan himself admitted that Pakistani cricket is in ruins because of politics. Who choses the president of the board? Oh my god! It's the ill knowledged(cricketing wise) president of the COUNTRY. Luck? It takes more than luck to win a cricket match dear. Maybe you should experience it before making wild claims.
Right. I never knew the Pakistan cricket team was in such a condition! But then of course, it doesn't come as a surprise sighting how things are at the moment.
Who said we doubted the quality of your legendary pacers?
Finally! A just statement.
, now let us stay that way.
