- Joined
- Feb 11, 2011
We have sent hockey team, we have approved to sent blind cricket team, why not cricket team for ICC event. It's pure politics and we know there are political bitc*** from both the nations, spoiling everything.
Yeah, I would, and i don’t see how it changes anything.I wonder whether you'd say the same for your side as well.
Okay, so at least we know it’s a racist government policy that is the issue.Cricket is a different ball game in both India and Pakistan. BJP's anti-Pakistan stance will be weakened if they send Indian cricket team to Pakistan. They do not want that to happen.
Plus India have not gone there since 2008, I suppose. So, the ICC/ BCCI chairman is son of India's home minister does not matter.
I understand that BCCI uses its financial clout..But wouldn't it mint money in case India plays Pakistan? In this case, I don't think its in BCCI's hands.I am not very good at understanding the political scenarios just not my thing.
Here is what I think:
The BCCI is clearly abusing the power they have especially with BJP government at the helm.
I hope somewhere down the line this is stopped like forming a union or something which will be against BCCI.
There has to be a somekind of a loophole which should be exploited by PCB or other cricket boards to maintain some parity levels.
At the moment with all the money involved its just a one way traffic and stubbornness.
Maybe involving the Arabs in cricket involving which may tilt the balance in terms of money and power but the Arabs are filth too ... Somehow taking the unparalleled power from BCCI is must.
ICC needs that fixture more than BCCI.I understand that BCCI uses its financial clout..But wouldn't it mint money in case India plays Pakistan? In this case, I don't think its in BCCI's hands.
On one hand you accuse the BCCI of calling the shots cause Jay Shah happens to be the son of the Home Minister. On the other, The Pakistan PM/ISI might appoint the PCB chair, ain't it similar? Both are political,ain't it?Yeah, I would, and i don’t see how it changes anything.
Yes, but the PCB doesn’t make cricket the victim of politics, while the BCCI does. Not that hard to understand.On one hand you accuse the BCCI of calling the shots cause Jay Shah happens to be the son of the Home Minister. On the other, The Pakistan PM/ISI might appoint the PCB chair, ain't it similar? Both are political,ain't it?
PCB needs the Indian team to visit- it is very simple. Otherwise,they wouldn't threaten by stating that the CT can be taken away. In your words- not that hard to understand.Yes, but the PCB doesn’t make cricket the victim of politics, while the BCCI does. Not that hard to understand.
Well, since you’ve opened the door to political insinuations, let me set the record straight.As for the BCCI the Indian government is well within its rights to send/not send the team. I believe the reasons are well known to everyone a d hence won't get drawn into the same.
What part of 'Reasons are well known and hence wouldn't get drawn into the same' did you not understand? This is exactly the reason why I didnt want to put in the details.Well, since you’ve opened the door to political insinuations, let me set the record straight.
There is a big difference- your team agreed to come and the match actually took place. As for the fanfare- I am sorry they didnt cater to Rahat Fateh and others- didnt know it would bother you so much. The Indian govt/BCCI is well within its right to invite whichever celebrity it wants. Please don't be that dumb.When the World Cup is in India : Pakistan are invited to the Modi Stadium to play India, and welcomed with fanfare. Arijit Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Shankar Mahadevan have a live performance. Amitabh and Rajinikanth are invited.
When the Champions Trophy is in Pakistan : 26/11, Kashmir, martyrs are suddenly remembered and become a big deal.
Truth is well know-proxy wars on both sides- load of tosh! This discussion would go sideways and hence there aint any point in deliberating this further.Proxy wars, until 2020, were conducted on both sides (the Indian PM mentioning Balochistan in his speeches wasn’t just for fun), don’t live in a fool’s paradise where India is innocent. The only difference is that the Pakistani military, as awful as it is, still didn’t make cricket into a victim of geopolitics (just like the Indian government doesn’t make other sports into victims, but focuses on cricket and artists).
And if it was such a big dealbreaker, the Indian PM wouldn’t have agreed to visit Pakistan in 2021 at the Pakistani military’s invitation, before the Pakistani PM scuttled the plan. So spare us the thinly veiled self-righteousness.
Or I can view it from your POV and all anyone could see is Jay Shah’s and Modi’s appendages in your mouthIf you look at it from Pakistan's POV they want India to come cause of the financial positivity that the team will bring. Without India, both PCB and ICC know it will be just another tournament. While, I would love to see PCB push its stance and perhaps take the competition forward without India, but that will impact the ICC's sponsorship big time.