Possibly not, would have made 1 ton though I reckon. 3 centuries in 3 innings is no mean feat, irrespective of the opposition. One of only 6 players (possibly 6 Englishmen can't remember the stat) to have achieved that. He's no mug, and I think gets alot of unfair criticism just because of the opposition he scored his runs against. He'd have been slagged off if he failed, but he made a hundred in both innings batting 3, and still gets baited. Very harsh on the guy, I'm convinced he's good enough for Test cricket.
Harmy would be proud of that.
Haha Warne ripping into Bopara, he really has something against him.
I mean playing him instead of a proper batsman is the issue. You can't play Bopara when you already have a player who has yet to perform when the team needs him and a batsman not good enough to make it purely on his batting in most teams in your lineup. Playing Bopara when you already have Bell and Colly just makes it so weak. Bell and Colly as it is both can get out cheaply. Strauss playing a loose shot didn't help. And the you have Bopara who can't score. Considering you can't drop Colly and Bell has just come in, then yea, playing Bopara is the main reason for England's situation.So Ravi Bopara's single handedly to blame for England being 42/4 :laugh I know people like to have a scapegoat, but that's very harsh. He played a bat shot, he's not going enough to be batting 3, but he is not the sole reason we're in this position.
Haha, anyone hear that?
"Watch your f***ing ass". Who said that. Broad or Haddin.
Haha, anyone hear that?
"Watch your f***ing ass". Who said that. Broad or Haddin.