AUS & ENG line-ups for the future
Obviously both teams are going to look to the future now after this Ashes series, so this is my final thoughts on how AUS should look in S Africa as they try and begin the new quest to possible be # 1 & how ENG should look for the home summer vs SRI/IND.
ENG
Just like how Duncan Fletcher had to go after the shambolic Ashes 06/07 & W-Cup 2007 - so too now Flower has to go. ENG i don't believe have a bad team like AUS didn't have a bad team this year when Mikey Arthur was playing - but they need a fresh approach.
Not 100% sure who should take over, been hearing whispers of Graham Gooch, but i don't know how realistic that is.
I also would advocate KP being given captain of the test ODI until he retires. ENG in this new phase needs an innovative captain, Cook is the kind of "lead from the front with runs" captain - that only works well if the team is playing well.
ENG in this rebuilding phase needs a captain with similar tactical acumen to Michael Clarke & KP is the only one equipped to do this.
Best XI: Cook, Robson, Compton, KP, Bell, Root, Stokes, Foster, Broad, Anderson, Rankin
Ballance, Taylor, Davies, Finn, Onions, Mills, Meaker, Panesar
Robson: Think Carberry is a solid player that could make runs at test level, but he was well worked out by an AUS bowling attack that bowled as well as any 4-man attack has bowled in history really.
But ENG need to go to youth & axing him for the much hyped young, Sam Robson is the obvious replacement.
Compton: Should never have been dropped, but he must be immediately recalled. He is the perfect # 3 replacement for Trott who is unlikely to return. Ian Bell is a top player but he generally comes across as a reluctant # 3, so just leave him @ # 5.
Their may be times due to emergence of Stokes that ENG will want to play a spinner & 5-bowlers. But this should be assessed on match by match basis - since its obvious ENG don't have an proper all-conditions spinner. Panesar despite his deficiencies remains the best - but he should not be played in all tests.
The choice for the keeper in James Foster is a bit of personal bias. But if the aforementioned balance is selected, this may be the best time to give the best ENG glovesman since Jack Russell a run in the side. However if this doesn't happen - you always have Steven Davies, who is the best performing 4-day keeper in ENG.
AUS
Obviously AUS batting faults were covered by Haddin's superb, Gilchirstesque batting efforts. Watson still has issues & Bailey still needs to convince as test player.
However i've been thinking if Haddin can maintain this batting, which many AUS fans always knew he was capable of @ test level, there is an argument that he could bat @ # 6. This way AUS could include James Faulkner - who i believe is a very talented all-rounder who can bat @ # 7 in a very solid manner.
So may say you don't need him with Watson in as an all-rounder - but i envision that AUS could take a leaf out of the book of Hansie Cronje book in the 90s by stacking the team with all-rounders of real quality. Check out this S Africa XI from 1998:
3rd Test: Australia v South Africa at Adelaide, Jan 30-Feb 3, 1998 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
Kirsten, Bacher, Kallis, Gibbs, Cronje, Rhodes, McMillan, Richardson, Klusener, Pollock, Symcox.
Of course Donald was missing, but regulary in the 90s - SA in their XI had Kallis as the top order all-rounder (Watson doing this currently) & McMillan/Pollock/Klusener as the competent lower-order all-rounder. I can see Faulkner & Johnson doing a similar role. Plus Mitchell Marsh is another one who can force in way into the XI soon - based on his all-round ability too.
So AUS have IMO the personnel to construct a very versatile test XI of players.