Okay, so from what sample set are you basing that theory on? Cos I could put money on it not being. And how is my blunder 'great' you have singled out one integer - conveniently I might add - when actually I said '3-4.' Notice the 3
As said earlier, I won't be talking anything on ECB and PCB's relations with Champions League.Okay, so from what sample set are you basing that theory on? Cos I could put money on it not being. And how is my blunder 'great' you have singled out one integer - conveniently I might add - when actually I said '3-4.' Notice the 3
Like everyone has been saying, Kallis, Taylor, White all would have preferred to play for their home teams. And I find extremely disappointing that they are not given this opportunity. Wouldnt it been better for Indian Cricket to play an Indian youngster instead of one of these three?
They are rules to retain a player sorry, nothing created by me or any otherWHY THE fling DO YOU THINK THAT CENTRAL COULD PAY $200k AND THEY'D GET TAYLOR. THAT IS THE MOST RIDICULOUS THING I HAVE HEARD.
They are rules to retain a player sorry, nothing created by me or any other
CLT20 supporter.
Even I agree that its most idiotic thing I've ever heard.
They are rules to retain a player sorry, nothing created by me or any other
CLT20 supporter.
Even I agree that its most idiotic thing I've ever heard.
Emslie said:"One can argue the merits of the case but that is the rule. They (CLT20) may be thinking of changing the rule in future."
Kallis' contract (with Bangalore) says if his IPL team gets into the CLT20 his team has the first option