Australia in England

[Indiangod]

Who are you on about?

 

[angryangy]

well he is right to some extent, if it was "easy" then no batsman would loose his wicket. just because it's easier doesn't mean there's still a degree of difficulty.

 

[Indiangod]

Who am you guys on about?

 

[Sureshot]

so u think u can just walk out and play and score a century just like that, if u ask langer or katich im sure theyll agree with me

Do u actually know what cricket is? Ever played it? How many centuries u got forget about the bowling attack

Why didnt the let hodge have a bat????? Either hes alerady in the team or hes not gonna be in it

http://content.cricinfo.com/australia/content/story/216210.html

Yes i know what cricket is and yes i have played it. I don't bat well that's why i'm a No. 11.

Ok each batsmen has to get in but who would you rather bat against to get a hundred, Harmison, Flintoff, Jones and Hoggard or Rafique, Ahmed, Baishya and mortaza?

 

[angryangy]

Personally, neither. Because batting is hard.

 

[Indiangod]

Batting is hard , you need concentration everey second , if you lose concentration then your dammed. and your technique should be good as well . It takes time to produce a quality strokemaker , who can play against 90mph bowling.

 

[Englishandproud]

It will be england who wins the ashes this year.

Well said that man

 

[Indiangod]

I hope I am right mate.

 

[angryangy]

lol it seems "arrogance" has been redefined as "not wanting to sleep with English fast bowlers and have their babies."

 

[aussie1st]

Too bad the English gave us such easy teams.I don't know how much the Century Hayden and Clarke will do to their confidence. Now the bowling hit out begins. Tait or Kaspa.

 

[Annihilation66]

I go for Tait. And although thenEngland bowling attack would be much harder to face the same steps need to be taken in terms of shot selection etc.

 

[JamesyJames3]

It dont matter who you select!!! ENGLAND are guna win the ASHES!!! *crowd roar*

 

[angryangy]

Good, I can feel your anger.

 

[m_vaughan]

Well in this logic, Ian Bell's 152 vs Bangladesh was one of the best test innings ever.

 

[angryangy]

You're just flame baiting by saying that. You know what he meant. He's saying that you should respect the fact that a player has done the work and gotten a century, instead of pointing out that they outclassed their opponents. Bangladesh don't just loose Tests without taking wickets. Obviously some batsmen find it difficult to stay in.