That shows how little you know about Australian cricket. Johnson is young and promising but Clark and Bracken are miles ahead of him, as are Hogg and Lee who are more established. You barely know who Hogg is so stop commenting about him.
So what if he is slow (he bowls 130's mostly anyway), he is taking wickets and is very accurate. He is playing very well and is very similar to McGrath. As for Pollock, he is one of the best pace bowlers ever just like McGrath is.
When we played South Africa we were away and that was back when they were highly rated. Before they nearly (so close yet so far India) lost to India at home.
[QUPTE=cricket_god]Is he been considered for a test call up after warnes retirement?
or macgill is the first choice and any young spinners coming through?
Not really, he is a OD specialist, he's too straight and not enough of a wicket taker in the longest form of the game. Australia has no 'first choice' because we haven't announced a squad yet since Warne retired have we? Our yong spinners include Nathan Hauritz, Beau Casson, Dan Cullen, Cullen Bailey and even Cameron White even though he's more of a batsman.
Comparing him to Murali is irrelevant. Hogg is a great ODI bowler, has nothing to do with Murali who doesn't play for India by the way.
Who? Clark isn't a swing bowler so that's just a stupid comment.
Australia has swinging bowlers, we just listed them for you, they can swing it out. As for Lee, he may be innacurate but he's getting enough results to make him better that 'still no great.'
Not really, as I said, Hogg is a OD specialist. He wouldn't make it as a test bowler.
I laughed when I read this in The Age, honestly I've never seen such a whinge. The Indians were happy to talk the talk but when it got serious suddenly Australia are bullies. If anyone wants to beat Australia, this is exactly how not to do it. You have to be tough, tough teams win tough games. Sledging is part of the game, comments like this will just fire up the Aussies more.[/QUOTE]
I have watched hogg for years so i know quite a bit about him being a bowler
his captains don't have confidence to play he may be a good bowler but is no big deal also ,i said johnson has potential to be much better than the current crop of australian bowlers its my view i don't need you to tell me my judjement
I admit he is a good bowler but he has just played 2 seasons and people comparing him to mcgrath thats what don't like also my view is he is nowhere near mcgrath
India were away too it was the same team i think
I was talking about sreesanth so its you who misunderstood so are you stupid?
Ben,hooper told me that ben hilfenhaus was the best outswing bowler dominating the circuit
Somebody called him the best spinner in odi so thats what my comment was
and good is the word not great .
ALso have you read symonds comments and does you thoughts apply for australia also?if sledging means abusing families then i do not think much of it
remember how mcgrath reacted to sarwan it does hurt does not it ?
It should fire up the indians more.
A cricketer is a cricketer if he cant play test cricket he is ordinary according to me .
Brett Lee is definately one of the finest bowlers in the world today. Randomly quoting some of his few bad games doesnt make him a poor player.
I agree about the Kiwi pace attack not being that great apart from Shane Bond. But then their second option onwards usually tend to be all rounders. So any fast bowler who wants to get into the side would have to be competing with Shane Bond only.
However like someone said, Sreesanth and RP Singh are the best India have at the moment, so it makes complete sense to stick to them.
Read my post mate i did not quote lee performances but taits ,
i have said he is one of the finest odi bowlers
Shane bond is also not that greta now bowling in the 130's he does not l;ook the bowler he was ,R.p ,sree could walk in to the kiwi bowling according to me.
India have stick with them are they are both great prospects both are in there 20's