TumTum
International Cricketer
If Broad clocks 150kph, it must be a female record
Thats the thing - he isn't. Broad clocking 150 just aint right, since surely Braod bowling clocking 150 wont be the feel the same for a batsman as Tait or Bond clocking 150. Thats why i saw everytime Broad may have clocked 150,it had to have been an error.
in this match or in the world? There seems to be an unusual amount of guys touching 150 right now.
Tait
Nannes
Bond
Aamer
Lee (Maybe)
Broad
Steyn
Morkel (sometimes)
Johnson
Im sure I am missing some.
Do you have some personal vendetta against Broad? You can't accept speed gun measurments for some bowls and disregard them for others. Lets see how he goes here in Bangladesh, but I have a feeling he will be quicker in Australia later this year.
I do agree that 150 from Broad is easier to play than 150 from Tait or Mitchell. Some bowlers hit the heck a lot harder and can "feel" faster.
Haa na son i have no problem with Broad, i'm a ENG supporter. I'm just highlighting that Broad clocking 150 k's is a example/sign of the speed guns being inaccurate at times.
.
Tait & Lee are in a different league when they are at their best. I wish Akhtar was still playing.
Bond doesn't hit 150 anywhere near 85% of the time hes mostly mid to late 140's these days.
Tait - 151-160
Lee (younger Lee) | Nannes - 148-155
Johnson - 145-155
Roach | Aamer - 145-150
Bond around - 145
Morkel | Rubel | Parnell inside 142-148
Steyn Best bowler, doesnt bowl like he used, working on his L&L then speed
MacLovin added 1 Minutes and 38 Seconds later...
99 Shoaib would top that list
"You don't really get an easy run at it if first-change and second-change can bowl that quick pace as well. It makes it tougher for their guys. I'm pretty glad we're not facing us actually."
The 'heavy' ball that Johnson bowls.I do agree that 150 from Broad is easier to play than 150 from Tait or Mitchell. Some bowlers hit the heck a lot harder and can "feel" faster.