drainpipe32
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Wow. I was gonna mention White in my last post and didn't. Gun. Fantastic knock, just continue's to contradict his critics.
Hopes' bowling has looked a lot better than Smith's so far though and we need the decent extra bowling option with Watson's bowling going for runs. Clarke in ODIs continues to be a rather large worry, perhaps we could have Smith slot in at five to replace Clarke, shift White up to four and keep Hopes. Hopefully Bracken proves himself in the Australian domestic season so we can play him, not have to worry about a second spinner and have his variations wreak havoc on the subcontinental pitches.
Yeah I agree with most of that. Except for Clarke, the guy's been averaging around 40 in the last year still. He's just the current trendy guy to bag. No one bags Shaun Marsh for example and he's been pretty dodgy of late. The guy who I hope is close to coming back: Callum Ferguson. He was playing great before the knee injury and will be the logical reserve batsman I would imagine.
There are a few other issues with this side though: 1) death bowling. At the moment, Watson is possibly Ricky's preferred bowler - not ideal, 2) Hopes v Smith at #7, 3) where's Haddin going to bat - opening? #6? Pinch hitting in the middle? I've still got the wild idea to open with Watson and Ponting - I think he'd be an awesome opener.
Oh and I just found out they are showing these England ODIs (or at least what they can fit around Wimbledon) on Channel Nine! Woot! More late night goodness
Attack lacks cutting edge - Australia - Fox Sports
Always felt that way with the attack we have, it lacks that strike bowler to rip lineups apart.
Yeah he's obviously going to be professional drink mixer for this tour, unless there's a paceman injury. Or if Clint McKay bowls pies for the first 2-3 ODIs v England.
Same for Shaun Marsh, he's really been screwed by Haddin's injury as Paine will be locked into open for the series I imagine.
Interesting to see Smith getting the #7 gig today over Hopes. I wonder how much the Ashes is going to play in Smith's selection/non-selection. Are we going to 'hide' him for the Ashes? Are we going to play him to try and get him some confidence against Pommie players? Or does none of that matter? I'd love to see him tried at #7 because I think our best team for a subcontinental world cup has he and Hauritz as 2 spin options with 3 specialists quicks + Watson to cover the pace requirements. Hopes is handy (as Mark Taylor will tell you a zillion times per summer), but I'm not sure how he'll fare over in India. He doesn't play spin well as a batsman and his bowling copped a fair bit of hammer when he played IPL over there.
Don't understand how Hopes is still in the team. Now that we have Watson in the team who can be used as the 5th bowler which means that we don't need Hopes as a 5th bowler and he is definately not good enough as a batsman to be in the team for his batting alone. We'd be better off playing Marsh, Voges, Hussey, Bailey or Smith
Either that or play 3 bowlers and 2 all-rounders and have Hopes at no. 8
Really? Hopesy's coming of a 5fa. I also think Watson has the tendency to occasionally be a bit expensive with the ball. I like Watson as the 6th option.
ODI number 3000.
And Watson got carted around by grade cricketers.