Australian Tour of India, October 2010/11

Despite 3 wickets and 31 runs, Ishant needs to be thrown out.
 
wow billy bowden costs the aussies again. howler. anyone remember sydney? are the aussies gonna be burning effigies and whinging for years to come? gonna threaten to boycott the tour? nah - cause we are good supporters who know how to lose....even though the aussies are by far the superior side.
 
wow billy bowden costs the aussies again. howler. anyone remember sydney? are the aussies gonna be burning effigies and whinging for years to come? gonna threaten to boycott the tour? nah - cause we are good supporters who know how to lose....even though the aussies are by far the superior side.

:laugh

Even after what happened with wickets in this match you are posting this. :laugh
 
Despite 3 wickets and 31 runs, Ishant needs to be thrown out.

I am with you, I know he'll come with something crap in next match but he won't be dropped surely after this match. Only injury can keep him out of next match.
 
I just saw the ball that Johnson bowled to Ojha and which hasn't given LBW. I can understand now why Australian fans are angry at him. That ball was taking the middle stump out if Ojha didn't put his leg there.

I don't understand why nobody was backing up that attempt for the run out, which resulted in four overthrows. Especially since only 6 runs were needed.
 
wow billy bowden costs the aussies again. howler. anyone remember sydney? are the aussies gonna be burning effigies and whinging for years to come? gonna threaten to boycott the tour? nah - cause we are good supporters who know how to lose....even though the aussies are by far the superior side.
ROFL. Umpire was fairly equal for both sides....... in bad decisions :p
 
I just saw the ball that Johnson bowled to Ojha and which hasn't given LBW. I can understand now why Australian fans are angry at him. That ball was taking the middle stump out if Ojha didn't put his leg there.

lets be fair though, sharma was given out to a ball that was really quite obviously going down leg (hit him barely inside leg stump, the ball was moving across him from the right hander) just a couple of overs earlier. they shouldn't have even been 9 down at that point. the LBWs though were generally rubbish, harbhajan had a couple of good shouts turned down and then got awarded one that pitched a mile outside leg. Gambhir was given out LBW to an inside edge. it was rather poor umpiring en masse.

I can't understand why australia had so little faith in hauritz though. Sharma was hardly going to cream any long hops for 4 in that situation, he can surely turn the ball more than north which would have made the batsmen nervous.
 
Last edited:
Tragedy for Australia, they really bowled wonderfully well especially Hilfenhaus although Gambhir dismissal was a SHOCKER. Laxman was pretty special once again, scored his runs very very quickly indeed.
 
lets be fair though, sharma was given out to a ball that was really quite obviously going down leg (hit him barely inside leg stump, the ball was moving across him from the right hander) just a couple of overs earlier. they shouldn't have even been 9 down at that point. the LBWs though were generally rubbish, harbhajan had a couple of good shouts turned down and then got awarded one that pitched a mile outside leg. Gambhir was given out LBW to an inside edge. it was rather poor umpiring en masse.

I can't understand why australia had so little faith in hauritz though. Sharma was hardly going to cream any long hops for 4 in that situation, he can surely turn the ball more than north which would have made the batsmen nervous.

What I saw was that Hauritz was too much outside off in the match and North was bowling close to batsman just like Andrew Symonds used to do.

Why not bowl Clarke for 5-6 overs?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top