ZoraxDoom said:I got 3 wickets in my last match, and 3 dropped catchesI only have one problem-seamers are damn impossible! Anyone got tips??? Please??
Jon S said:Yeah, reversing the oppositions batting order is quite fun, it's good that there is such a noticable difference in the abilities of different batsmen.
chu70 said:The more i play the more i love the game. Ive played cricket 2005 maybe 4 times. I keep playing BLC, its so fun. Batting,bowling,fielding are all real fun. And its only a six over game so the big scores are fine, surely itl be different with 50overs etc. It is a bit easy, but there will be different difficulties. the gameplay and physics are just better than cric2005 i reckon
Gotta say I agree with this, BLIC will get boring so quickly, it just doesn't feel like it's a cricket game, sure it's fun as an arcade game but I want a realistic cricket game, EA demo initially is not as much fun but it did feel like a cricket game.rahulk666 said:I agree that C2K5 is way better than BLIC. BLIC is too arcadey. The bowling will become montonous and predictable soon. The AI is bad and even if CPU requires 16 runs of the last over, it does not try to hit for four or six. It will block the deliveries. No autoplay means you can't even skip the bowling. No front foot/back foot shot means that you just press a button and arrow key and AI does the rest. NO control for you. The CPU bowling too is absymal. I have faced balls bowled at 20.1 Mph!! What the hell is that?? Hitting six is very easy. Hawkeye technolgy is good but seeing it every over you get bored off that too. The animations are smooth and less choppy than c2k5 but ea has better graphics. c2k5 may have more bugs but BLIC just isn't a proper cricket game for hardcore cricket game fan. EA wins hands down.
I meant batting against them.barmyarmy said:I found a great tip. Edit the Aussie batting order so Glenn McGrath is opening. Then you can do what you like with your seamers!