BLIC Demo Opinions and Reviews
- Thread starter Ste
- Start date
m_vaughan
Chairman of Selectors
The demo is crap
Hicksy551993
Club Captain
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Online Cricket Games Owned
i think people are a bit too fussy.
BLIC demo is great FUN even if it is a bit easy (there will be an option to change the difficulty in game) Cricket 2004 ws so easy that it wasnt fun, but i still have fun dominating England in this game hehe.
The demo has impressed me so much that i am going to order the game from England when it is released rather than buying cricket 2005 that is released now.
BLIC demo is great FUN even if it is a bit easy (there will be an option to change the difficulty in game) Cricket 2004 ws so easy that it wasnt fun, but i still have fun dominating England in this game hehe.
The demo has impressed me so much that i am going to order the game from England when it is released rather than buying cricket 2005 that is released now.
Absolutely right. The BLIC demo is a real turkey. And of course it represents the quality of the final game.
Does anyone seriously think that they are going to release a demo which they don't think shows the game in it's best light. Why would they release a demo, a mere 4 weeks before the final release, which was a sub-standard version? So people can say "hey, that's crap, that means the full version will be much better....". Do me a favour.
Wake up and smell the coffee, BLIC fanboys, the game is a dud. It's like a children's toy. So many basic cricket shots are missing. All you need to do is just press the "fire" button and expect to score an auto-6.
And what about the longevity of this simplistic, arcade nonsense....6 months? 6 weeks? 6 days? I'd say about 6 overs.
Does anyone seriously think that they are going to release a demo which they don't think shows the game in it's best light. Why would they release a demo, a mere 4 weeks before the final release, which was a sub-standard version? So people can say "hey, that's crap, that means the full version will be much better....". Do me a favour.
Wake up and smell the coffee, BLIC fanboys, the game is a dud. It's like a children's toy. So many basic cricket shots are missing. All you need to do is just press the "fire" button and expect to score an auto-6.
And what about the longevity of this simplistic, arcade nonsense....6 months? 6 weeks? 6 days? I'd say about 6 overs.
Ankit kukreti
Club Cricketer
sam p said:
The demo was just a 6 overs match, the final version may not be very different from that. But I will say again it is going to be better than cricket 2005.
It's fun to play BLIC, it depends on the user if you want to smash the ball it is not difficult in the demo but I prefer to play normal, defensive shot and also leave the ball some times. BLIC is perfect for that, it is a fast paced cricket game unlike cricket 2005. Demo is limited and does not allow us to explore the game much, but still much better than cricket 2005.
Intresting features in BLIC are creating player mode, 5 commentators, so many grounds, classic matches, hawk eye. BLIC is a action packed game having great atmosphere, cricket 2005 is to boring for me, how can we play that game for hours and for long period of time.
Last edited:
jkartik
Chairman of Selectors
Ankit kukreti said:
BLIC is fun to play that is true.but it wont last fot a long period.
you'll get amused only for a week or so.afterwards you'll start getting
bored of smashing every single ball out of the ground.
the game has no challenge in it and also has a very poor AI
and the game is full of bugs and glitches.
i agree with sam_p. why wud they release a demo who's code
is not finalised.RG said that the game has been sent for duplication
and yet he has not submitted the list of changes.
Last edited:
Briggsey
International Coach
Its too arcadey for a cricket game, moves along too quick.
I don't think the fact that we were playing on easy matters one jot.
OK, I agree that it's likely that on hard mode that 6's will be less easy to come by than the demo.
But the real problem I have is that the demo shows that gameplay is too simplistic, lacks too many basic cricket shots and clearly lacks depth.
It's an obvious cliche, but it's just not cricket. It's more like some children's playground game. I almost expect the bowlers to start bowling under-arm, and then the bell to go to say it's time for double-chemistry.
OK, I agree that it's likely that on hard mode that 6's will be less easy to come by than the demo.
But the real problem I have is that the demo shows that gameplay is too simplistic, lacks too many basic cricket shots and clearly lacks depth.
It's an obvious cliche, but it's just not cricket. It's more like some children's playground game. I almost expect the bowlers to start bowling under-arm, and then the bell to go to say it's time for double-chemistry.
Similar threads
