jordox
International Cricketer
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Online Cricket Games Owned
I agree, according to the rulebooks this is a correct decision by the umpire. But
No.
There is no buts. The rulebooks are the only thing that matter.
I agree, according to the rulebooks this is a correct decision by the umpire. But
I dont remember him so I vote BUCKNOR!!
Oh trust me, INT umpires get payed stacks. They are the elite. They get paid between US$332 and US$882 a Test Match.
Exactly. Bucknor knows the rules, that is a testament to his ability.No.
There is no buts. The rulebooks are the only thing that matter.
It was more than a couple of calls, mate. In fact he was in the thick of it in India's last tour to Australia as well. He's just not up to it. Nature does not randomly plan to ignore certain people and it certainly hasn't ignored Bucknor.Bucknor has always been my favourite umpire, I am surprised he got removed due to a couple of bad calls.
It's also because he's been below-par beyond an acceptable limit. Sure, the Indians had something to do with it, but if you're going to claim that his poor umpiring had nothing to do with it, you're just trying to rile people up.Its because Indian wanted it. I think he should umpire until he wants to stop. And there should be a best umpire award named after him
Knowing the rules is not a testament to his umpiring abilities... andrew_nixon probably knows all the rules of cricket by heart but that does not necessarily make him a good umpire.Exactly. Bucknor knows the rules, that is a testament to his ability.
The problem is that poor umpiring has done nothing to his career at all. It had nothing to do with him being dropped from Australia v India, the ICC admitted they dropped him as per India's request.It was more than a couple of calls, mate. In fact he was in the thick of it in India's last tour to Australia as well. He's just not up to it. Nature does not randomly plan to ignore certain people and it certainly hasn't ignored Bucknor.
It's also because he's been below-par beyond an acceptable limit. Sure, the Indians had something to do with it, but if you're going to claim that his poor umpiring had nothing to do with it, you're just trying to rile people up.
Knowing the rules is not a testament to his umpiring abilities... andrew_nixon probably knows all the rules of cricket by heart but that does not necessarily make him a good umpire.
It was more than a couple of calls, mate. In fact he was in the thick of it in India's last tour to Australia as well. He's just not up to it. Nature does not randomly plan to ignore certain people and it certainly hasn't ignored Bucknor.
I understand he made a few bad calls, and I have seen anothers in different games make bad calls, but I don't understand why he was dropped and none others? There were many bad calls during the Australian tour of India in 2001, but no umpire was stepped down.
It is because the BCCI didnt have full control over the ICC
The day i no longer support cricket.No we control 80% of it. Soon with IPL growing we will abolish ICC and name it BCCI.
No we control 80% of it. Soon with IPL growing we will abolish ICC and name it BCCI.
Would you happen to be among the short sighted who believe that's a good thing?No we control 80% of it. Soon with IPL growing we will abolish ICC and name it BCCI.
Would you happen to be among the short sighted who believe that's a good thing?