mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
I think Pathan is a good bowler for India. I disagree with Singh being your best fast bowler.
A perilous 50-50? I'd say an easy 60/40 Australia's way.
Going back a decade Australia won the 3 test series 3-0 in 1999/2000 (then won all 3 games against India in the C-U series), Lost 2-1 in 2001 in India (won ODI series 3-2), drew 1-1 in 2003/04 (ODI: 3-1 then a 2-0 win in the finals) and finally won the 2004 season test series 2-1. Counting the recent 2-1 test series win and 4-2 ODI series victory that shows India only winning 1series out of 5. From 1999 onwards India haven't beaten Australia in an ODI series.
No doubt India are the most competative team when playing Australia, but my point is, using the same logic, you could say England are also the ones "doing the beating on us" considering they to, have won a (test) series against Australia in a decade of international cricket. No matter how quality the series' have been, the fact is, India have won very few of them.
Did you ever think that perhaps he is so unfit that he completely stiffens up after a spell.
I hope not. Munaf is the far better ODI bowler.
20 minutes ago.When does the match start?
There are two teams out there, and one of them is watching cricket.