If they do lose, will Ponting be the only Aussie captain to loose the Ashes both home and away?
Looks like we won't have Harris.
Ryan Harris injured as Mitchell Johnson build-up branded insane | Herald Sun
Possibly from when Kontouris was rubbing ████ on his chest (not literally ████ obviously) on the boundary, thought it was his shoulder at first.
Ponting will not walk out | Fox Sports
At the end of the day Ponting is right. All the talk of Ponting losing the captaincy after the Ashes is extremely naive & is pure panic talk.
Its not as if Australia have a super smart Mark Taylor style skipper ready to take over from Ponting.
If AUS do lose the Ashes. AUS fans should simply be backing Ponting to regain his batting form & remain as skipper. Since AUS in the next couple of years will still need him more than ever.
Ponting is not the problem or cause for these poor performances. As i always say its the incompetent selectors whose decisions & squad selection is the underlying problem with the AUS test side.
Risk should only be taken if your that you are 100% confident in your risk replacement or risk tactic that it will pay off. If not no way.
So this time conservatism with experienced domestic players such as D Hussey (maybeeeee Cam White although i prefer Dussey) & test experienced players like Hughes is the selections that have to be made.
I think it has to be either David Hussey or Shaun Marsh. I think you need experience for the Ashes so id be leaning towards David Hussey...the thing about making changes is that its very easy to drop someone...but you've got to always ask yourself "can the person thats coming in do any better? Are we changing for the better? Although Shaun Marsh and David Hussey have decent first class records...i agree with you in that we cannot be 100% sure that any of the players we're bringing in can do any better.Sounds nice, but with that definition not many risks would ever be taken. I mean if North is replaced would you be 100% confident that Dave Hussey would outplay him? I might be 70% sure, but you'd be a lunatic to have it at 100% - otherwise you'd be betting everything you owned on it.
And I wouldn't call bringing Hussey or White as 'conservative' - they weren't even in the 17 man Gabba squad. Surely their selection would show even more of a risk taking attitude by the selectors if they'd suddenly leapt over Khawaja, Ferguson and Smith.
I do see your greater point though and I'd agree. Try random, more risky things next series, but not with a big series on the line.
It dont matter what team the aussies pick, it will simply not be as good as ours therefore all this talk of change is wasted breath.
If these other options were so good why were they not either picked for the 1st test or even picked in the ashes squad?
Simple answer they are no better than you already have and its just a typical blame game after a defeat thinking you must change this or that.
All i read is about north having to go, so replacing him is really going to improve your batting right now yeah, well what about watson, katitch if he wasnt injured and ponting theres not alot of runs there right now and clarke isnt in top nick.
I think you guys just need to accept you just aint very good anymore i mean as an englishman weve had years of it.