Gone4aDuck
International Coach
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
That is in no justifying the lack of gameplay reveal you have
I have an excellent idea.....................sod off, twat!
That is in no justifying the lack of gameplay reveal you have
Well yes none of the games have any real trailer out.but it's factually wrong to say AC13 have shown more.
Not really AC09 had a different AI,new models and animations etc etc still retained the basic core of a codemasters cricket game.If you're betting on AC13 being similar to AC09 as the reason for dismissing DB14, you're going to be disappointed.
I think you again answered you own question.. yes its an average game but i still have more experience playing that and i can expect something from AC13.I'm trying to have a sensible conversation here. How is being like Ashes 09 a good thing?
yeah call me back when you have finished playing AC13 for 10th time.Ashes 2009 > Ashes 2013 (It's not even close)
"member since 07" hmmm that doesn't sound like hundreds of years for me.We have been following this whole process for a year now and have been following cricket games for hundreds of years
I think Martyn found a way round this ignore thing...in a few days there will be some other muppet like this
I bet you are the type of guy who farts in elevators for kicks.....talk about turning up at the wrong party......man it is a party....the greatest cricketer ever to have graced this Planet is about to grace the greatest cricket game ever made......Let people enjoy the party man.......
I have an excellent idea.....................sod off, twat!
Now I get it.
You are that retarded boy that got kicked out off School because you were screaming "WHY DON'T I GET A BONER?? ".
Now I get it.
You are that retarded boy that got kicked out of the Supermarket because you were screaming "WHY DON'T I GET A BONER?? "
Are you that guy?? ASS-ES FAN BONER??
IDk but i think we should be just grateful that someone is working on a decent cricket game.
Well yes none of the games have any real trailer out.Not really AC09 had a different AI,new models and animations etc etc still retained the basic core of a codemasters cricket game. I think you again answered you own question.. yes its an average game but i still have more experience playing that and i can expect something from AC13.yeah call me back when you have finished playing AC13 for 10th time."member since 07" hmmm that doesn't sound like hundreds of years for me.More fanbots4your Mr BigantEgo.
I'm just can't imagine the amount of hilarity if this game fails.
I am just wondering Ross was one of the things you told Cricket Australia that you got the Don Bradman license?
More fanbots4your Mr BigantEgo.
Perhaps as a result of being published by Codemasters, which AC13 won't be.etc still retained the basic core of a codemasters cricket game.
Keep it civil please. People are entitled to disagree and it's possible to try and point out where they're going wrong without getting personal and insulting them.
My apologizes. He just got on my nerve.....
keep your fanboy logic with yourself.Beyond your logic apparently.
I'm really sorry i'm not a kissass. just because this is the only one of cricket games being made after all these years doesn't mean i have to be a fanbot.Oh how times have changed....
That's not an opinion that's a stirred up fanboy rage which is hilarious.And if my opinion is that you say rubbish just to try and sound clever then i may express it. Now.......be gone!
I didn't say it would be well known it would be something i can expect it to be.Perhaps as a result of being published by Codemasters, which AC13 won't be.
but asserting AC13 is well known because of AC09 is factually wrong.
Opinions are not "right" or "wrong" they never are unless its argument about facts.Anyway, you're entitled to your wrong opinion.