Leicester Fox
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Online Cricket Games Owned
i'm more bothered about the lack of stuart broad. Anderson needs to sort out his action and until he does that he shouldn't be playing for england
No matter what his action is, Anderson is a proven quality ODI bowler. That's a lot more than Stuart Broad is at this moment in time.Leicetser Fox said:i'm more bothered about the lack of stuart broad. Anderson needs to sort out his action and until he does that he shouldn't be playing for england
aussie1st said:Just no space for him as the selectors 1) Don't see him as anything other than an opener, 2) Hes left handed and we got too many of them.
He'll be the next opener picked though overtaking Jaques in the list.
Drewska said:I think he batted at 3 or 4 northants a couple of times this season.. but i'm not sure it would be good trying to mould him into a middle order batsman. But number 4 is a position australia are having a bit of trouble filling.
Leicetser Fox said:ok maybe anderson should be there ahead of broad but tremlett. whats he done recently?
McDonald bowls fast-medium instead of medium pacers, and averages 31 in FC cricket, which is better than Symonds. And the old man who has umpired him on numerous occasions says he is a very good and very talented cricketer.symonds_sixes said:McDonald doesn't offer more than Symonds does in the bowling department. Symonds can seam and swing the ball as well as bowl conventional off-spin and darting off-spin.
cricketmad09 said:McDonald bowls fast-medium instead of medium pacers, and averages 31 in FC cricket, which is better than Symonds. And the old man who has umpired him on numerous occasions says he is a very good and very talented cricketer.