ZoraxDoom said:Blackwell(4)
barmyarmy said:And that, I suspect, will remain his test high score...
"Don't forget!! Room 69! I'll be waiting."muhammad_inzi said:guy look at this what is going on in this pix.
varunvgiri said:You dont care about whether Jaffer getting dropped was a right decision or not BUT u care whether dropping Ganguly was right or wrong.Why????????
. Ganguly was born into one of the richest families in Kolkatta and was privileged from bith. Jaffer is the son of a bus driver, has no godfathers, got into the team both times purely o the basis of performances not because he's a Bengali or a Malayali. And you care more about Ganguly who has a hundred powerful godfathers.....
What is this absolute fantastic form of Ganguly that you are talking about.A forty and a near forty.
Ganguly has never had a great test record to be honest. He averages just above 40. At this age you do not expect him to get better than he was before. Quite honestly, Ganguly at his best would have had to fight hard with Yuvraj for a place in this team....
m_vaughan said:But I think England will get more confidence out of this game, because despite having a severely depleted side, they matched the Indians in their own backyard and in my opinion outplayed them. They scored more runs and picked up more wickets than the home side. Lets hope they can carry on the momentum into the rest of the tour.
Kudos to Andrew Flintoff and his Team England.
barmyarmy said:Seaming wicket is fine as far as we're concerned. England's seamers are certainly better than India's and putting Plunkett in will reduce the workload on Freddie, Hoggy and Harmy.
@ Sai - can't see Chappell picking Ganguly at present