how do you rate planetcricket.net?

[sachin]

So as long as the score is accompanied by commentary,then it is okay?If thats the case,that sounds cool to me.

 

[andrew_nixon]

So as long as the score is accompanied by commentary,then it is okay?If thats the case,that sounds cool to me.

As long as the commentary isn't "play by play" commentary, such as "so and so is out".

As a rule, posts should always include something that isn't available on any other site.

 

[sachin]

So it has to be something that doesn't have something to do with the actual ongoing play?Great............brilliant.........'Sarcasm'
Why does every single post have to be unique?

 

[andrew_nixon]

Why does every single post have to be unique?

2) Administrators/Moderators: All members are obliged to obey the instructions of administrators and moderators. When posting in a particular forum, members are obliged to obey the instructions of forum specific moderators. If you feel that any such decision is unjust we ask you to firstly follow any instructions, and secondly if you believe that the decision is not just, depending on the severity of the scenario, report it to an Administrator.

There you go.

 

[sohum]

Oh, PC. The rules are a little harsh but one lives and learns. I, for one, appreciate the fact that the forum doesn't have distorted tables and whatnot. Loading is pretty fast which means the forum can be navigated quickly. However, I do have a few problems.

There are far too many immature posters. Of course, that can't be controlled. I don't want to imagine the day when PC becomes a restricted forum. It just gets annoying when posts are reduced to "I agree" or people don't really state anything in their messages. Secondly, I also think that there are far too many staff members running around. I don't think all mods are up to chalk, but I guess when the forum becomes this big, one has to make some sacrifices.

Anyways, my experience at PC has been pretty awesome.

 

[Skater]

I agree with your point about immature posters, sohum. I think there is also too much 'TXT' language here. Why use 'U' instead of 'you'? I mean come on, it's not very taxing.

 

[sachin]

Ahhh,the new Andrew Nixon!
Personally Andrew,i think your avoiding the question.I wish you'd stop hiding behind your veil of Administry......

 

[andrew_nixon]

Ahhh,the new Andrew Nixon!
Personally Andrew,i think your avoiding the question.I wish you'd stop hiding behind your veil of Administry......

If you have a problem PM an admin, don't post here.

 

[sachin]

Right,i'll think about it.Too late at the Mo'(ohhhhhhh,sorry Skateboarder,hope i didn't offend you....),Yawwwwwwwwn!

 

[jkartik]

Right,i'll think about it.Too late at the Mo'(ohhhhhhh,sorry Skateboarder,hope i didn't offend you....),Yawwwwwwwwn!

if you are so sorry... why did you post it in the first place ? :

 

[sachin]

What i was alluding to,was the word "Mo'".Skateboarder doesn't like words to be abbrieviated.

 

[Skater]

No, I don't like 'txt' language. Words like 'u' instead of 'you' and 'y' instead of 'why'. That just shows a laziness.

 

[sachin]

Or convenience:
And Mo' is one of those words isn't it.

 

[barmyarmy]

This thread is going nowhere.
Time to close it.