Can you please elaborate on exactly what holding is upto? As I am just checking the scores only.
He was after umpire error from the outset and if you were to gather his tone, it almost seemed like he was blaming WI situation on it. I'll elaborate-
1) Gayle given out caught behind- The ball nicked the off stump (no idea how these bails don't fall off) and "LIVE" it seemed to everyone that it was a goner. The umpires have an ear piece and Gaffney must have heard it. I'm pretty certain,
any umpire in the world would have given it.
2) Gayle given out lbw in the same over- Hit on the full Yorker. Poor decision. Thanks to the review, it was overturned.
3) Gayle given out lbw by the same umpire an over later- Umpire's call on impact and wickets. "LIVE" it looks out to me. Regardless, it was "OUT" on field.
By this time, Holding had blown his lid off. The Holder LBW accentuated his feelings and I don't think the Holder review was Mike Gaffney.
Please note, I am not defending the no ball. That's straight up nonsense. I
get that. I am just calling out Holding, just like Manjerekar and Raja.
And for everyone that's calling out the umpires, it's fair that they are criticised but are they ever praised? The players are too powerful and the on field umpires are literally there to just signal 4/6 (after the 3rd umpire confirms it). Everything else the 3rd umpire does officially. Okay, may be wides. We need to make the umpire powerful and more importantly, respected again!!