barmyarmy said:Well aside from the fact you've just contradicted yourself in this post it's not a great idea to call anyone a fool for expressing an opinion let alone an admin.
He also started the 'Were the Aussies paid to lose?' thread iirc.
barmyarmy said:Well aside from the fact you've just contradicted yourself in this post it's not a great idea to call anyone a fool for expressing an opinion let alone an admin.
angryangy said:Come now, do I really have to point out how many NZ players rank in the LG rankings. You can't pick whole teams, only players. But for the omission of Sangakkara, the Test batting lineup is about as strong as you could expect it to be. On the other hand, what's so wrong about the bowlers? The ones that have been selected are all accomplished and in considerable form. The only player that really got the short stick was Chaminda Vaas and he hasn't proved particularly effective in Australia, anyway.
Sureshot said:He also started the 'Were the Aussies paid to lose?' thread iirc.
barmyarmy said:Well aside from the fact you've just contradicted yourself in this post it's not a great idea to call anyone a fool for expressing an opinion let alone an admin.
That's not impressive, nor is his Test average in Australia, a shade under 38.charith said:Umm actually Vaas's record against the aussies in ODI is pretty good so you can't say that he's not affective in Australia.
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w
29 208 24 13.86 0 0 36 3/27 32.58 (Against Australia overall)
15 109 20 12.11 0 0 21 3/27 31.76 (Against Australia in Australia)
These stats are perfectly fine so you can't say dat he hasn't been effective in Australia.
I wonder what the World XI will dosachin said:I think the World IX will crumble.They won't get far.Very disappointing series.In my opinion.