ICC Super Series

What will be the outcome of the ODI Series?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
iceman_waugh said:
Shame on the ICC rather .
The concept put in was bound to flop and even Malcolm Spped accepts it.
Also ther future of the Super Series in is doubt seeing as the Aussies dominated over the World XI in both forms of the game. ;)
I don't know that the concept itself is particularly flawed, but it could stand to be refined. More than one tour match would probably be welcomed by the players. In fact, maybe even a tour match that last longer than one day would be useful. For the sake of continuity, it probably needs to be the one team for both ODI and Test.
 
We can kiss good bye anymore Super Series.

Waiting for another Super Series? Don't hold your breath. ICC boss Malcolm Speed has done a backflip over the concept in the aftermath to the hopelessly lopsided contests between a resurgent Australian team and the badly misfiring Rest of the World. In all likelihood, this is the end of the World XI as we know it.

Speed was bitterly disappointed by their efforts in three limited-overs defeats and a shellacking in the Test. The ineptitude of the World XI's batting in their ill-fated trek to Australia was highlighted by the fact that they lasted 50 overs, exactly 50 overs, just once: in the second innings of the Test.

The ICC had planned to stage the Super Series every four years, but those plans have been shelved. Part of the reason is that there may not be a clear-cut No.1 team in future years. The major reason, though, is the failure of the World XI to fight while on these shores to make the project work. A possible solution is to hold a one-off clash every four years between the first- and second-ranked Test nations. Otherwise, the idea is heading for the scrap heap.

Advertisement
Advertisement"As far as the Rest of the World team is concerned, we share the players' disappointment in their performance," Speed said. "It's not something we will put in on a regular basis. It's not something where we're going to say we'll play this every two years, every four years or every six years. I would have liked the World XI to make more runs. We all would have liked that. The performance of the team is not under our control and, as I say, we share the players' disappointment.

"What we had hoped was by bringing a team of champions together, a team spirit would come from the two weeks they've been together. I'm not sure whether that happened."

World XI coach John Wright said the missing ingredient was that indefinable last little skerrick of commitment that can make such a difference to a cricketer's performance - the type of commitment Wright was only able to quantify by placing his index finger just inches from his thumb, grimacing, shaking his head and saying: "That much." In other words, not much at all.

Wright said the players' intensity was less than it would have been for their countries. He refused to point the finger but the villains were there for all to see. Andrew Flintoff, for example, seemed eager to hit as many balls as possible out of the stadium and onto Bondi Beach, whereas he would have been far more selective with his shotmaking if wearing an England cap.

"That's been the hardest bit for me to grapple with - getting that last ? whatever that extra bit is that seems to come more to the fore for your country," Wright said. "That was always going to be the challenge for us all.

"Some of the shots we saw in certain situations, you'd probably want more. That's where I look at myself and say, well, could I have gotten something else out of them that I didn't?" World XI captain

Graeme Smith, who made 12 and nought, agreed. "You grow up in your country and dream of playing for your country ?" he said. "You come here, where you don't know the guys you are playing with and playing for.

"That all adds up to an environment where you maybe lose that 20 per cent. For your country it is do or die. Maybe this isn't do or die for every individual that is here."

It might not have been do or die for the players, but it was for the concept. No need to go to the video umpire. It's out.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/...uper-series-out/2005/10/17/1129401198557.html
 
Sureshot said:
It can only work if the World XI play together at least 10 times a year.

Ah bull dust, they don't need to play together often to know how to bat? The only thing that really sucked about the World XI is there batting and it's a individual performance thing, not a team effort.
 
It can only work if they pick in-form and consistant batsmen rather then a heap of big-hitting celebrities.
 
Pietersen has been in-form though. Not amazingly consistant though, he was a good selection.

I am glad the umpires are against the new referals. I like them but I think they used them too much. In the test it just didn't work out.
 
The new rules were good in a way. The mistakes made was way less than usual. But it took out the emotion of knowing the outcome straight away.
 
irottev said:
It can only work if they pick in-form and consistant batsmen rather then a heap of big-hitting celebrities.
Yeah, that sounds good in theory, but how do you tell who is "in form" and who is just a "big hitting celebrity"?

2005 Tests to date

Greame Smith 900 runs @ 60.00
Virender Sehwag 729 runs @ 72.90
Rahul Dravid 531 runs @ 59.00
Brian Lara 765 runs @ 69.55
Jacques Kallis 979 runs @ 81.58
Inzamam-ul-Haq 569 runs @ 71.13
Flintoff 585 runs @ 34.41

It can only work if the team is allowed opportunities to get match practice. You can't expect players to carry pristine form from continent to continent without keeping their arms warm.
 
i think england can beat a non england XI, anywhere at england but not lord's

and in mumbai,give that pitch, we(India) can thrash anyone in 2 days
 
The thing is most of the World 11 players, didn't play a cricket match for ages. Only the English had any match preparation.
 
ajay2k5 said:
Ah bull dust, they don't need to play together often to know how to bat? The only thing that really sucked about the World XI is there batting and it's a individual performance thing, not a team effort.


Rubbish one of their big failures in the ODIs was their running between the wickets. Batting is a team game not an individuals game, unless your name is Jacques Kallis/ :D
 
Ashish_Nehra said:
i think england can beat a non england XI, anywhere at england but not lord's

and in mumbai,give that pitch, we(India) can thrash anyone in 2 days
India, most likely, though Warne and Murali would certainly be interesting on that particular pitch.

England, not so sure, Australia didn't loose a Test with Glenn McGrath in their team, so the World team would probably be interesting.
 
Here's my idea for the Super Series.

1) Scrap the Test match and just have a 3 match ODI series.
2) Play it straight after the World Cup, with the winners taking on the rest of the world.

All players would have had games in advance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top