Have to laugh at people who will use this to justify not using DRS, what is it now? One dodgy decision against Khawaja, now a dodgy third umpire decision. Two bad decisions apparently render an entire system useless when the far more unreliable system (that actually didn't prevent this decision) is apparently fine.
Oh so you have to laugh at ppl who don't quite agree with your views on DRS that it is a system made out of rainbows and sugar and spice and everything nice, meant to eradicate all umpire errors in the world. Also there have only ever been "two" bad DRS decisions in history !! Where have you been living man.
DRS has gotten a lot of basic pedestrian ones right, mostly where even the naked eye replay could tell you whether the decision was right or wrong. However the kind of nonsense it has spewed up over the years makes me wonder how ppl support this mess to begin with, where no one has a fking clue what they are doing or are supposed to be doing. Here are some DRS howlers for you, below, which will take it to way more than just the 2 you seem to know about. A system that throws up these many errors consistantly is nothing but a failed system and its about time ppl came to accept DRS as one.
Hawk Eye, that ball ain't bouncing 2.5 feet over the stumps. Don't fking care what that imaginary line drawn by someone presumably on crack half the time says.
Actually the frequency with which edges don't show up on Hot Spot, was the source of one of the greatest tweets I have ever read. It was by ScyldBerry, when something like, when Warner took his pot shot at Root in the bar, he should have asked for a review, knowing hot spot the blow wouldn't have shown
This one is a bit like a radio broadcast, don't know why they removed the footage, but you can clearly make out what is happening listening to it.
Same Dravid incident another vid.
This Root dismissal
Here is one from this article
worldinsport.com/fixing-drs/ -
"an appeal was made for a catch against Dravid, at short leg, which Rod Tucker, turned down.
However the English side reviewed the decision, and despite their being no clear evidence of an edge on Hot Spot or otherwise, and without the use of snicko, Third Umpire Steve Davies, overturned the decision and ruled Dravid out, leaving everyone baffled."
www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-2523607/ASHES-2013-DRS-controversy-strikes-Joe-Root-given-out.html If you scroll down this article you will find some more instances of DRS howlers, listed.
This is not even to mention that former Eng skipper Strauss, and not just any random guy, has said that players
don't trust hot spot. “Hot Spot just creates confusion. Sometimes it shows up, sometimes it doesn’t, so
no-one really trusts it.” What is even the damn point of arguing about a system that a former player, that too one whose side was one of the champions of pushing for DRS, now says, the players no longer trust it, after all the cock ups it has made.
You really think that after all these examples BCCI is not even 1% justified in saying we are sorry but this whole DRS party you guys have got going kinda sux. Are these too many one-offs for you, or are you starting to see a pattern here.