New Zealand Tour of India, November 2010/11

The umpires have been pretty average this series, but the poor decision have more or less balanced each other out.

Taylor survived a pretty plum LBW shout, so it was kind of fair that he was given out to a shocker.

Guptill's was just plain and simply terrible decision, I thought it hit him out side leg, let alone pitch outside leg.
If Sunil Gavaskar who was commentating at the time was sitting next to me, I would have knocked him out. He said "that's another good decision by Taufel" (referring to the first one being McCullum's LBW), then when it showed hawk-eye he just didn't mention it again.
That guys been pissing me off the whole series, is he only commentating because he was a great player? He's one of the worst commentators I've ever heard.

As I said though, Williamson got one go his way in the first test, so I'm not too fussed.

Guptill and Hopkins are probably the only two players that may not be around for the Pakistan series, but that will be all good, as we really need them back at Auckland to beef up our top order.
 
McCullum was plumb ! Taylor got away with one that was hitting the middle of middle stump. Guptill got a bad decision and then Taylor too, but it wasn't all just towards India. Either way, I don't think it mattered to the result of this game.

Poor umpiring though. But it often happens on spinning, bouncing tracks like this. This was a brilliant pitch. Indian curators can learn more from this.
 
Can I also just mention how useless Vettori was in this match ? Bowled very many loose balls, and on a pitch that clearly had something in it for the spinners, he wasn't lethal enough.

Is he much better than Ashley Giles at Test match bowling ?
 
Normal services resumed by the NZ batsmen, a shame to finish the series with such a downer.
 
New Zealand fought well but Indians were always going to get them in the end. I think it should be a good morale booster for New Zealand after the Bangla nightmare. India on the other hand will have their work cut out against SA. Its India's batting against one of the world's best Pace bowling attack on helpful tracks.
 
Can I also just mention how useless Vettori was in this match ? Bowled very many loose balls, and on a pitch that clearly had something in it for the spinners, he wasn't lethal enough.

Is he much better than Ashley Giles at Test match bowling ?

When the bowlers he's playing with aren't very good, he has to play defensive. I felt that this series he's bowled quite well, apart from when he bowls to Harbhajan

I'm quite happy that I was away for this test. We played terribly from what I've seen.

lol at Southee top scoring in the second innings and being second top I think in the first though.
 
Its more to the fact that Indians were patient against Danny as they knew if they shut him out then wickets will be hard to get from other end. Something which happens to Bhajji as well. Opposition tend to shut him down.
 
Can I also just mention how useless Vettori was in this match ? Bowled very many loose balls, and on a pitch that clearly had something in it for the spinners, he wasn't lethal enough.

Is he much better than Ashley Giles at Test match bowling ?

Well for the series he got more wickets, had a better average, and a better E/R than both of the Indian spinners.

He did very well, as India (bar Sehwag and Singh) were just trying to play him out.
 
Ryder's out of the ODI series because of that calf injury. No surprise there :facepalm
 
Holy ████, 8.30 start, I know it's not a test match, but our test matches in NZ start at 12.00 - 12.30.
Vettori and McCullum both out. :facepalm

CG123 added 3 Minutes and 37 Seconds later...

Might as well call it India B vs NZ B, they're resting all their main players, and we're without McCullum, Ryder, Vettori, and Oram.
 
Can anyone tell me, why do we call some Indians by their last names, and some by their first names?

E.g. Tendulkar, Dhoni, Sehwag, Dravid, Gambhir all last names, while Zaheer, Harbhajan, Yuvraj all first names.

Like even when Harbhajan and Yuvraj don't play in the same match, I never hear anyone say that's a good shot by Singh/that's a good ball by Singh, same goes with Zaheer, no one says that's a good shot by Khan.

What's the reasoning behind it?
Is it different religions/cultures?
 
Well Khan and Singh are quite common Indian names so that could be it
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top