I feel a bit sorry for the Tremulator. The guy has delivered pretty consistently.
Also Broad's numbers in the last 2 years are far superior to most bowlers in world cricket, so it somewhat misleading to judge him based on his first couple of years... Much like Finn went for far more runs before he was dropped than since he came back.
Although it's not like you to use statistics that are outdated
So because he was sh1te early on means we should DISTORT his figures to suit your ends..............?!?!? I never say you can't allow contributory factors, but what you're advocating is fiddling figures because you don't like the real ones........................................
I've heard that LAME argument many a time for Flintoff and others, funny how I don't hear it for others. Maybe we should only cite Hick's best years and promote him to legend status, disregarding all stats from when he was dropped every 2-3 Tests :
Although it's not like you to talk out of your Rs
----------
What, why is Taylor in the squad and Bopara out? I know Ravi didn't do well but surely he deserves a run. How can any player be given confidence if he gets dropped consistently like Bopara does?
Bopara wasn't dropped, he opted out which is a mistake on his part given his limited chances. If Taylor grabs his chance then bopper may come to regret it.
Of course we should never pick him because if you exclude "outdated" stats Bopara has done nothing to deserve being picked, those hundreds he scored shouldn't count BEWARE the stats police, they apply non existent laws
My post is by no means a slight on Taylor, he is a capable player but Bopara deserved at least one more game.
Frankly Bopara would have been lucky to get another chance after his wasting of the two knocks he had last Test, but he's put something else first which I'm sure the selectors will "add to his account" and he may not get his next knock or two for a while
Last edited: