on the face of it, it does look like England should win this series but this is exactly, exactly, the type of attitude that saw sri lanka end up drawing 1-1 in 2006.
But the Sri Lankan side was a far better side back then. It's like the roles have been switched, England were in a sort of transition phase in 2006 where as this time it's Sri Lanka in the transition phase.
I mean in 2006, Englands pace attack was; Hoggard, Flintoff, Plunket, Mahmood/Lewis. With the batting line up; Tres, Strauss, Cook, Pietersen, Collingwood. That is an absolutely horrible side that played with GoJo, Flintoff and Panesar making up the numbers.
Admittedly the batting was strong but the bowling unit was dire. I mean none of those 5 pace bowlers will ever get back in the England side. 2006 was a bad period of time for England, and continued through too the Ashes with the 5-0 hammering.
The team is FAR FAR stronger than what it was 5 years ago. That Ashes winning side, in 2005, might come close to the strength of this side but no way the 2006 side even gets close.