They could have pumped all this money they've spent on The Hundred into the Blast. Help teams get some bigger stars (look at how many big name players were off playing in an exhibition tournament in Canada or going to the Euro Slam instead of a stint in the Blast), market it better. Maybe work out some agreement with the BCCI that might get the likes of Kohli across, even just for a few games. GET THE ENGLISH WORLD CUP STARS INVOLVED FOR GOD'S SAKE. The big names won't even be in most of The Hundred which is the most laughable thing of creating an entirely new format.
I mean obviously a hundred times this, but it's not the ECB's strong point.
A smaller but no less stupid example can be found in scoring software; for years, Total Cricket Scorer had been de rigeur for scorers up and down the country. Unfortunately it wasn't profitable for the guys who ran it, and as a result the IP rights, software licences, employees - everything was available for sale at a fraction of the market value for anyone prepared to keep the company going. Like perhaps a national governing body?
But the ECB passed on that, and decided instead to create Play Cricket Scorer Pro. For just four times the cost of buying an existing, working system, they were able to rush through an incomplete and buggy system in time for just after the start of the new season this year. They have also outsourced it to a company in New Zealand, which is an added cost.
-
Similarly, the MCC Universities scheme is flawed in all manner of ways. Genuinely awful in many ways, but still a valuable stepping stone into the professional game for guys who want to get a degree first and even as it declines, it still accounts for something like 30% of county pros. And it did all of this on a budget that was less than the salary that Ben Stokes gets paid as per his Central Contract. And to all intents and purposes, it got axed last year; a shadow of it will continue to exist, but the budget for running an entire MCCU scheme for a season is now to be approximately 1.5 times the salary of
Anuj Dal. No slight meant to Anuj Dal, but that's not going to be enough to maintain a value, and employ a coaching staff that will be of any value to young players. The system that has developed 30% of county cricketers, and offered many a safety net for after their careers, is dead in the water.
-
I'm not saying that Ben Stokes shouldn't be paid well by his Central Contract. Nor am I saying that innovations in cricket scoring software won't ultimately prove to be useful. But I am saying that the ECB is woefully myopic with regards to its budgeting and planning. And this translates into the present state of the Test team, which appears to have lost the ability to play Test cricket. It feels like the best way to persuade the ECB to invest in the Blast would be to convince them that it is the fiscally senseless option.