SiriusBlack
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
you are the one trying to lynch just because I raised a suspicion against you.
Ok, first up, I'm sorry it comes across that way. That's usually not the way I play, and the same goes here. I've only gone after you based on your response to my defense to your initial suspicion.
What if you are wrong and I am a townie, that's the end of the game.
Not necessarily. We still have the vigilante who I'm confident will play his cards right tonight and if I'm not wrong, the town can take it down to the wire and still win it. Definitely not the ideal situation, but I'm confident that it's a risk worth taking.
On top of my head I can remember in the User Planetcricket mafia That's how I played against Ali and President Evil and in the same game on the other day that's the same way I played against Asprin. I agree it is not a good game style I should definitely work on
It's not necessarily a bad thing if the accused person tries to weasel his way out of your attacks, but once a defense is put up, still going after someone while being a townie is a worrying sign.
I did the same mistake here and is responsible for Asprin lynch. I should have went with my other theory about why wasn't you or Fake Passport was not killed on Night 1, the same theory which I applied on this day(Day 3).
We're running around in circles. It's not always about getting rid of the most experienced players, it's about what works best in the context of the game. C'mon man, we literally won as mafia together while keeping User alive the entire time.
The thing is my posts seem as they are made by town but I don't think anyone of the Ali's post gives a tell about him being town.
Alright then. If you can convince me that he's anti-town without teaming him up with me in your accusation - which I can 100% confirm he isn't - I won't hesitate with a lynch. It'll be something we can both agree on, and I think it'll what's best for town.
unlynch Jack Ryder