Story The Origin Of Test Cricket:IvoBligh's XI in Australia;1882-83;3rd Test;Two innings in one day!!!

Well Its looks like England Might try to pass 450 with las wicket partnership..
We will see..great Story..I loved it...
 
More than the score which England have got, the scoring rate was absolutely amazing! :hpraise Wonderful classic story :)
 
Bulletin

Australia wilted under the pressure and were reeling at 116 for 7 by time the lunch was served. In the morning, the English batting folded without a whimper , Palmer taking a fiver. There was some speculation that Engalnd might reach 450 but that was not to be.It was a different story when Australia came out to bat. The English gave little away and bowled a probing line. Bannermann was the first one to go with a Morley fast swinging Yorker hitting him on the toe. Two balls later, Mordoch was back in the players lounge, caught behind.Australia slipped to 3 for 41 when Studd accepted a simple chance to get rid of Horan. Morley wasn’t done and he castled Mcdonnell with a beauty. Studd ended the resistance of Massie with a zaffa and Australia tumbled to 84-5. Giffen and blackham fell to brilliant catches behind the wicket and the sad story of Australian innings came to a brief respise.
The session belonged to the English. As a matter of fact , the entire match has gone the English way.They have batted brilliantly and bowled well and the fielders have been exceptional. The Australians have been left clueless and their chase has stalled even before it could gather some steam. They need a shooting star now or the English would level the series. And judging the way the game has progressed so far, the first looks a wonderland fantasy while the latter a more believable truth.

Gallery



Studd is furious to lose his wicket



Palmer takes a bow for his five wickets


Bannermann is stuck in the front


Murdoch goes for a duck


Morley goes through Mcdonnell's defenses.


Massie pays the price for going across the line.


Giffen is caught behind and...


.....And so is Blackham by a flying Tylecote

England:405 All Out
Australia:116/7
 
Last edited:
Well England have destroyed Aussis...
Great Bowling by England...Anyway that was the real time for England in real..

Great Story..Great Presentation..:clap
 
Thanks a lot for your comments.I really appreciate it.

No Bro..We should appreciate your work.....
You are doing hard work...But Honestly its Different Story,Great Photos and Awesome Presentation.
 
Bulletin

The Australian innings didn’t last too long. The play resume half an hour late due to the heavy downpour and the rest folded without any fight. A disappointing total of just 147 overs and they lasted just over 47 overs. Morley is the star with 3 for 27 off 11overs. Massie fights a lone battle. The rest just fail to fire. Rain rules out the play for the rest of the day.There is a moment of controversy as Ulyett in his followthrough walk doen the pitch and imitates a defensive storke as to say to the batsmen, Thats the way to do it.This hasn't gone well with the batters or the spectators.
The next morning, everyone is surprised to see the English coming out to bat.Admist the boos, the English captain Bligh defends his decision to bat again. “Our plan,”he tells Wisden “ is to bat the opposition out of the match. The pitch is wet and it will crack once the sun comes out. We don’t want to bat last on this pitch. No sir, noway!”
The Australian bowlers stick it to the batsmen and run making is a big chore so much so that when Studd falls to an ugly swipe across the line, the scoreline is just 17 off 11.4 overs! The English seemed to have a very cautious approach and they put extra pressure on themselves by not scoring. Leslie seems to be riding his luck as he is dropped off consecutive balls by Murdoch and Blackham. The unlucky bowler is Spofforth. But the big man is not to be denied. For in his next over, Leslie’s stump go for a walk.
22 for 2 off 15.4 overs becomes 3 for 34 as Barlow is trapped legbefore by Spofforth.
Garrett produces a peach of a delivery to dismiss Steel. Steel gets down on one leg for a drive while the balls seams and takes off the legstump. This brings the deadly duo of Read and Barnes and it works wonders. Suddenly, the scorecard that had become stationary, becomes a bandwagon. Barnes continues his good form and with Raed, he adds 61 runs off just 6.1 overs. The partnership ends with Barnes running out. But Raed sweeps Palmer to bring the 100. On third morning , England go to lunch at 104/5.
The first half of the session belonged to the colonials who denied English the chance to run away with the match. But when Messers Read And Barnes joined hands, the scoreboard looked like a bandwagon. Losing Barnes was a big blow. But Readis in there and with a lead of around 370, England have the match in their pocket.

Gallery


Ulyett has some pointers for the batsmen


Studd loses his patience and stumps to Spofforth


Leslie is dropped by Murdoch...


...And then by Blackham


Before Spofforth gets him in his next over


Barlow is leg before to Spofforth


Garrett forces an error off Steel


Barnes falls to the run-out bug


Read sweeps in air

England:405
Australia:147
England:104/5
Read:30*(27)
Tylecote:1*(7)
 
Last edited:
Well Surprise No Follow on???
Anyway England is set for Win...Aussis have hardly any Chance..
England looks dominant in 2nd innings also..Read over the Strike rate of 100..

Nice Story and great update..keep up the good work..
 
May be KX there was no Follow On rule at that time!!..Lol..:p

A new Code of Laws was approved by the MCC Committee on 19 May 1835, and another on 21 April 1884. In the 1884 laws the number of players was formalised for the first time (at eleven-a-side), and the size of the ball was formalised for the first time too. The follow-on rule was introduced. This was in response to the problem that to win a game a side needed to dismiss their opposition twice. A side that batted first and was fully on top of a match and scoring lots of runs would have to wait until it was dismissed a second time before it could attempt to dismiss the opposition a second time. As cricket is a time-limited game, it meant that sides that dominated the opposition could be forced to draw rather than win games. The initial follow-on rule was faulty, though, as it required a side to follow-on when it was behind. A side could deliberately concede its last wickets in the first innings in return for being able to bowl last on a deteriorating pitch. Later the follow-on rule was changed so that a team sufficiently ahead of its opposition has the option on whether to enforce it or not.

So, you are right on that point!!!
Updates coming later on.
 
Guys sorry for no updates recently.I would like share some good news with everyone.I am going to be a father.My wife is preganent.Wow!!I am so happy....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top