Dare
Chairman of Selectors
too bad Fidel isn't there to test the chin of Hughes if he plays.
Dare; said:too bad Fidel isn't there to test the chin of Hughes if he plays.
Ponting said he rather have Hussey than Hughes, ouch!
Interesting, a few weeks ago he was backing Hughes saying he was impressed with how determined he is and how much he has improved since being dropped.
In any case, Hughes and Hussey are much better batsmen than North (who is only there to fill the temporary void) :doh
Lee faces uphill battle for Test spot | Cricket News | Australia v West Indies 2009/10 | Cricinfo.com
Selectors,thinks that Lee will struggle to get back on the test side.
Can't see many potential surprises for the Aussie squad, it should be a 14 manner, with a spare batsman and two spare quicks.
So for all the talk, I think Hughes, Hussey and North will all be in the squad for the 1st Test, just in case Michael Clarke's back flares up and one of them needs to step in.
Same for the bowlers, Brett Lee should there along with the 3 younger quicks (Mitch, Siddle, Hilfy). Maybe even Stuart Clark too, just to make up the squad.
"I think it's going to be extremely rare that we go into a Test without a spinner," Hilditch said, praising the improvement of Hauritz.
"As far as Nathan's concerned we've been really impressed with his progress.
"He's bowling a lot better now than even during the Ashes. It's been a pretty steep learning curve."