Cricketville
School Cricketer
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Indiangod said:Well..........Gangully is a good captain check out thae stats in the last 4 years on india games and check how many test and odi series's ganguly as won ,
Number of test series won outside India in the last 4 years (even a donkey can lead India in Indian conditions. Its outside where it counts) = 1
Number of One day series won = 1 ( not sure. But hey, I neednt remind you of the number of finals India has lost under Ganguly..what is it ? 14 losses and 2 wins ? Hardly an A+ grade on Gangulys report card ! Not by a stretch.)
and if you havent noticed ganguly as a captain got india to the world cup final , and swiped evreyother countrys of the floor apart from the aussies , but could not finesh the job in the final ,
Relevance now? How many finals has India won since then ? zero. Has there been any improvement ? no. Therefore, is Ganguly doing his job and producing results? no.
Yes he is playing crap as a batsmen , but India need him as a captain , after all ganguly 's the one who borught back dravid after being severley critasised as the slowest player , and a crappy player , he also brought back y singh , kaif , h singh , and laxman into the india side , after a struggle in thier earley careers.He fully backs all his youngsters as well .
It was the selectors that brought back Dravid. Not Ganguly. Yes Ganguly brought in Kaif and Yuvraj. Averages ? around 30. Are there better or comparable batsmen in India ? Yes. Theres Sriram, Rao, Badani to name a few. Have they been given a fair run in the team as those two pets of Ganguly have ? no.
Can Laxman bat? Yes, but no better than to average 32. Can he bowl? no. Can he field ? no. A non performing passenger in the team. If Ganguly has backed him in ODIs as you say, thats a poor reflection on his judgement rather than a positive highlight.
On that sehwag issue he is a better player than sehwag , sehwag ddoes well on big occasions , and he is also a usefull wicketaker , he avearges 32 at the moment in bat , and afridi avearges a dismall 27 for a batsmen.
Afridi averages 35 with the bat in the last one and a half year. Sehwag averages 30 in the same period. Afridi is without a question the better boeler and fielder.
and sehwags played good in the last 2 asia vs africa game , and another dismall performance by afridi where asia needed him to get the innings going with some aggreasion and at least make some runs .
If every player is only as good as his last innings, then Bradman must be the worst batsman on the planet , eh ?
I dont know what you are taking about but even in test sehwags a quality player who as played well in the last 2 years in test and made some match-winning performances who avreages about 50 in tests .
Absolutely no relevance in a thread dealing with limited overs performances in the lead up to the world cup.
Sehwags a better and quality player than afrid my friend.
In tests, undoubtedly. In One dayers, debatable. Afridis batting average is on the rise while Sehwags is on the decline. Afridi is the better bowler and fielder. Go by hard cold facts, not reputations my friend.