squiz said:Warne over-rated.......
hmmmmm, he's just the world record holder with a record of 539 wickets @ 25.58, Strike Rate of 59.8, 28 five fors (innings), Eight 10 fors (matches). All of his wickets have come against top quality sides, none of that Zimbabwe and Bangladesh rubbish. He doesn't bowl 40-50% of the sides overs, but has to share his wickets with other world class bowlers (Gillespie and McGrath). Come back from a shoulder injury, and a 12 month ban, plus several other injuries, lots of off-field dramas, and still takes a bag.
[sarcasm] Very overated Nik [/sarcasm]
hbkjai said:Yeah.. lol.. no seriously that dude's definitely the luckiest batsman ever.. n I've watched enough innings to confidently say that.. bad decisions.. dropped catches.. more edges than normal for any batsman.. He certainly does NOT deserve 20 centuries!! Unfortunately that can never be changed so.. Still as I said good on him for making it count.. And sure.. the NZ attack was threatening right?
I'll agree with this.....greencarrot2 said:Overated: Harmison
Underated: Hoggard
Simple as that
nik said:i think caddick was underrated! ps. what has happened to caddick?!
An average of 21 in the VB Series is scratchy?nik said:brett lee has been a bit scratchy recently, and i think kaspro deserves his place in the test side!
sahil said:Got thrown out after tendulkar smashed him for a six in a world cup match in durban in 2003.