You've been Warnered!

[Leicester Fox]

Why does every thread on both Web and Planet turn into a Tendulkar vs the world thrad.

Imposstible.

because Tendulkar has a massive collection of moronic fanboys who have just come along and are completely ruining any cricket discussion so the only way to deal with them is to troll.

 

[vaibhav mehta]

Were you guys criticizing Tendulkar after his 2 failures?

Actually Tendulkar has played lots of memorable knocks in U19 and stat level before he came to international cricket. He and kambli played 4 days without declaring the innings and made 700 runs together and after that match they both got call from Indian team.So Tendulkar had better background than Warner, I guess.
Though I don't favor to drop Warner at all. I think he deserves fair amount of chances.He has potential no doubt.

 

[.::Stevo::.]

Okay I havn't checked this thread since i made it. How in the world did it change into a Tendulkar vs Warner?? And plus why does every thread with another player apart from tendulkar get turned into one?

Obviously, unless your a dumbass, Warner isn't as good as Tendulkar is, he hasn't even played a first class match, let alone a test match. But the man has sheer strength and that ability to entertain, whats wrong with that??

 

[Inbox24]

Okay I havn't checked this thread since i made it. How in the world did it change into a Tendulkar vs Warner?? And plus why does every thread with another player apart from tendulkar get turned into one?

Obviously, unless your a dumbass, Warner isn't as good as Tendulkar is, he hasn't even played a first class match, let alone a test match. But the man has sheer strength and that ability to entertain, whats wrong with that??

I think the fact that is not Indian, that works against him, especially on forums such as these.

 

[Highlander999]

I think with the fact that there is a large percentage of the members who are Indian there is always going to be some sort of favourtism towards Tendulkar. Doesn't mean "them" or "us" are wrong, it is just that people have different opinions. It doesn't help the situation though with some members who just "troll" (I despise that word) pretty much saying he is God. He isn't "God" he is just a gifted sportsman. We're in big trouble if Ronaldo starts getting called "God" for example of a gifted sportsman

Needless to say, Jonathan Trott is pretty damn good

 

[Precambrian]

Why are the English and the Aussies trolling here? One guy posted Tendulkar vs Sehwag and there are 15 replies from them saying the guy is trolling. :

 

[Highlander999]

Pot calling the kettle black, comes to mind with you saying that.

Anyway, I am going to find somewhere where I can watch Warner in action, especially with all the hype around him

 

[.Mob]

T20 and ODI are different forms of the game....
1st T20 he scored 89, 2nd ODI he scored 69 pretty good effort if I do say so myself. Go have a look at how many runs Gilly, Dhoni, Afridi, Tendulkar and any other player you want made after 2 games.

Well, there's the quote that started it all off, and all the Sachin fanboys replied. So yeah, the fanboys didn't start anything, they only replied.

 

[max_dillon2007]

because Tendulkar has a massive collection of moronic fanboys who have just come along and are completely ruining any cricket discussion so the only way to deal with them is to troll.

There is a reason we treat him as god. Its not only cricket but the off field behaviour and generousity of tendulkar makes him great. Has he ever been caught- in hotel with ****s(shane warne),- smoking marajuana(Herchelle Gibbs), match fixing(Mohammed Azharuddin), -leaving team meeting for fishing(Symonds), sledging, openly criticising someone in media(K.P), drugs(Shoaib). Answer is NO. He has never been in controversy in 20 years long career. He is so generous if ou go to his house even when he has just came back from a tour he would agree to invie u in and give you autograph(yes i went to his house when he returnedfrom england last year).




And it was the thread starter who compared the warner based on his performance in first two matches against tendulkar. That was really insane. Shahid Afridi scored 37 ball hundred in his second ODI and look at him now. Vinod Kambli scored two back to back double centuries in his debut test series,u see him anywhere now?i doubt u even heard his name. Even Ricky Ponting was a nobody in his first 3 or 4 years of international cricket. Only now he has been a player who can be compared with tendulkar. But Warner! you gotta be kidding. People wud'nt way this much if he had compared Duminy with Tendulkar, coz duminy has proved himself in the test series and ODI. He is far more better player than warner.

 

[Leicester Fox]

It was not the thread starter who compared them and regardless all Aussie was trying to do was illustrate a point about how Warner has had a good start to his career, no-one is overhyping him so why criticise.

 

[Deleted member 11215]

There is a reason we treat him as god. Its not only because we have no sense of reality and think cricket is more important than life but its also because our god isnt real and we seek reassurance by convincing ourselves that he has some god given power.

Corrected.

 

[aussie1st]

And it was the thread starter who compared the warner based on his performance in first two matches against tendulkar. That was really insane.

LOL for the billionth time will you get it through your head that I WAS NOT saying Warner was better or worst than Tendulkar. Point me in that quote where I said that?

 

[Highlander999]

OMG Syl, u izzz cauzing problemzzzz on da forum. LOLZ, you dis God!!!!!

::::cool::crying

(The extra use of smilies which seem to be cropping up these days )

 

[max_dillon2007]

It was not the thread starter who compared them and regardless all Aussie was trying to do was illustrate a point about how Warner has had a good start to his career, no-one is overhyping him so why criticise.

If so then why had he chosen TENDULKAR?? he could have chosen a lot of other players. He just wanna show Warner good against Tendulkar by comparing their starts as he didnt had a great start to his career. Why didnt he compared Warner to K.P?? he would have been PAWNED there. K.P had 3 centuries in his debut ODI series.

max_dillon2007 added 4 Minutes and 3 Seconds later...

LOL for the billionth time will you get it through your head that I WAS NOT saying Warner was better or worst than Tendulkar. Point me in that quote where I said that?

Originally Posted by aussie1st
T20 and ODI are different forms of the game....
1st T20 he scored 89, 2nd ODI he scored 69 pretty good effort if I do say so myself. Go have a look at how many runs Gilly, Dhoni, Afridi, Tendulkar and any other player you want made after 2 games.

ther you said that he was better on the bassesof first few performances. why dont you Include K.P or matrin guptil(Kiwi) to your analysis. Then see how good his start really is. To me Shaun Marsh is a far mor better and tecnically correct batsmen. Shaun Marsh would go a long way. He was sensational in IPL.

 

[aussie1st]

Still not seeing where I said he was better.... Is it not a "pretty good effort" by Warner to score 89 in his first T20 and 69 in his 2nd ODI. I then told the quoted person to go have a look at how many runs other players have made because he wanted to know how many runs Warner had made after 4 matches. No where did I say he was better than any of the players I listed or the players he listed.
The point was he has made a good start to his career NOTHING about him being better than anyone. Have you got that?