sohum
Executive member
Point?dayne said:what i said... or meant, evidently no? i didnt rule out anyone
Point?dayne said:what i said... or meant, evidently no? i didnt rule out anyone
sohummisra said:Point?
haha, so wrongi think it will be 1 out of these 4 shaid afridi, virender sehwag, adam gilchrist. andrew flintoff
Don't get bumping and spamming confused, if you post a rubbish post in a really old thread, it will get deleted, and posts raising up a really old thread are usually expected to be of a higher standard than those in an active discussion, but if a post is on topic, in the right topic, it doesn't matter if the thread isn't active. It is preferable to use an existing thread than to start a new one.
Don't get bumping and spamming confused, if you post a rubbish post in a really old thread, it will get deleted, and posts raising up a really old thread are usually expected to be of a higher standard than those in an active discussion, but if a post is on topic, in the right topic, it doesn't matter if the thread isn't active. It is preferable to use an existing thread than to start a new one.
haha, so wrong
1. It fits the criteria for bumping a thread perfectly.