I think the '4 more reviews' that the metacritic page is talking about is for the critic reviews
User rating is already available (0.3 ) .
Then they might notice all the negative reviews coming via this site and remove them.Maybe PC could put it on the front page or start a new thread so more members can mitigate the inevitable fake positive reviews from the publisher?
4 more reviews required on metacritic before the rating (weighted average) is published.
If you can name the players in any given GIF you should win something...
...you should email Chief and Fegan, and say if they will not come here and explain their game, explain how they could go so wrong and mislead us so completely, you will ban them.
I think to do that would be incredibly petty and meaningless. We're a third party, they don't owe us anything. Evidently, they didn't owe the people who paid for their game an actual PLAYABLE game of cricket, either. So I doubt banning them would achieve anything, other than make PC staff look a bit ridiculous.
We're the civilized ones... Lets keep that moral high-ground, yeah?
A collection of some of the widely varied commentary - PlanetCricket - Your home for Cricket Games and Discussion ? commentary