jdbais
International Cricketer
Without McGrath these sides are very evenly matched. Should be a good series from here but I still think Australia will win if they get McGrath back by the fourth test.
langerrox said:fishbowlman? if england were so 'great' how come they struggled to bowl at number 9 10 and 11?!?!?
It spun miles. It the Gatting ball was more shocking as we (at least us in England) had never seen Warne before. But yeah - it wasn't badwoodzy said:I think Shane Warne was extremely unlucky not to get man of the match, he really played well, runs, wickets you name it he did it. I think the Edgbaston crowd were given a treat for his last performance there. Do you guys think the Strauss ball was just as good as the Gatting ball?
The_gas said:Excuse me?
I doubt that very much. Lee/Gillespie/Kasprowicz are only a shadow of what McGrath is, and with McGrath and Warne in the same bowling attack I don't think you stand a chance.m_vaughan said:I hope McGrath plays in the 3rd test. I think England can beat Australia with or without their leading fast bowler.
Well most people would think that. But I dont believe that is true. Yes McGrath makes an otherwise ordinary Aussie bowling attack look good, but England can deal with McGrath just like the Aussies dealt with Harmison in this test match.squiz said:I doubt that very much. Lee/Gillespie/Kasprowicz are only a shadow of what McGrath is, and with McGrath and Warne in the same bowling attack I don't think you stand a chance.
McGrath >>>>> Harmison, good luck trying to deal with him and Warne- if he doesn't play again for the rest of the series it'll be a reasonable contest howeverm_vaughan said:Well most people would think that. But I dont believe that is true. Yes McGrath makes an otherwise ordinary Aussie bowling attack look good, but England can deal with McGrath just like the Aussies dealt with Harmison in this test match.
Australia have a much better chance of winning with McGrath in the team, but its definately not guaranteed.
brad352 said:OK, everybody on the bandwagon
Seriously, well played, great game but don't read too much into it just yet
McGrath >>>>> Harmison, good luck trying to deal with him and Warne- if he doesn't play again for the rest of the series it'll be a reasonable contest however
EVER?Sureshot said:Oh yeh McGrath is the greatest fast bowler ever, but Harmison is second best imo.