sohum
Executive member
It's not all about form is it? How do you think Dravid has managed to average more than 40 in two of the last three seasons? He is due for runs. If you look at just the very concept of averages, you will notice that in the previous game most of the Indian batsmen scored well below average. In that regard, my if's depend on past records and fortunately for you the Australian team doesn't think one-dimensionally like you.Yeah, "if" who is in good form for India or is looking like he can actually make a score except for Yuvraj, Dhoni or maybe Tendulkar?
Of course you immediately jump to extremes. Is there no middle ground between a batsman making a score less than what they normally score and a player scoring 4 times what they normally average?Yeah and what if Hayden converts a 60 or 70 into a 140 or 150?
Or Ponting makes a century?
Or Adam Gilchrist makes a century?
And what if 290 suddendly turns into 370?
I think angryangry's post summarizes the situation very nicely. Of course credit must be given to the bowlers, but the previous match also showed that there may be potential rewards if we manage to put the bowlers under pressure early. And just because it is an if doesn't mean that it has less chance of happening than some people on this forum have of understanding the situation.No one is giving our bowlers enough credit, the reason all India's batsmen (bar a few) have been failing is because our bowlers are in top form. It's all well and good to say that you will win if more than 2 batsmen hit their straps, but in each of Australia's innings we have had no more than 2 or 3 batsmen go on to make a big score.
Last edited: