Story Australia Journey Chappell-Hadlee Trophy - New Zealand v Australia

[riz7khan12]

yay nz chased down a massive score its 2007 all over again

 

[Aussie Team]

V

2nd ODI - New Zealand v Australia at Eden Park, Auckland ​

Preview​

It doesn't take any long for the Chappell-Hadlee rivalry to turn fiery and an opening win for the hosts. Chappell-Hadlee matches have a habit of being close and the opening game of this series have been exception. Ross Taylor (101) and Scott Styris (100) led his team to a last over victory in Hamilton. Both teams expecting for a win over the remaining four games in the Chappell-Hadlee Series. Finding 11 fit players is half the battle for New Zealand. The hosts are desperate for the return of Neil Broom in Auckland after he missed game one.

Much of the focus for the Australin camp has been their injury worries, with Lee added to the casualty list on the weekend. They are already unable to pick Brad Haddin, Stuart Clark due to injuries. It has left the team short and they would be keen for fringe players like Ben and Manou to step up in the remaining four games. Australia are without Lee in Auckland with a hamstring injury.



New Zealand (possible) 1 Brendon McCullum (wk), 2 Jesse Ryder, 3 Martin Guptill, 4 Ross Taylor, 5 James Franklin/Neil Broom, 6 Scott Styris, 7 Gareth Hopkins (wk), 8 Daniel Vettori (capt), 9 Daryl Tuffey/Nathan McCullum, 10 Tim Southee, 11 Shane Bond.



Australia (probable) 1 Shane Watson, 2 James Hopes , 3 Ricky Ponting (capt), 4 Michael Clarke, 5 Cameron White, 6 Michael Hussey, 7 Graham Manou (wk), 8 Mitchell Johnson, 9 Nathan Hauritz/Steve Smith, 10 Ben Hilfenhaus, 11 Doug Bollinger.

Pitch and conditions​

New Zealand enjoy this small ground, which doubles as a rugby union field, and think their local knowledge is a big bonus. Some evening showers are predicted on night, with a top of 24C and a minimum of 16C.

 

[MaD]

Seriously dude, if you can't think of your own words to write this story, just don't
and you spelt century wrong

 

[Aussie Team]

Seriously dude, if you can't think of your own words to write this story, just don't

mate, I'm using my own word, I've Read the article which has impressed me and I'm trying to frame on my own with article's idea in mind and convert them to story paras here.

 

[MaD]

All you've done is copied this guys preview and changed a few words

 

[Aditya]

Aussieteam why don't you write the whole updates on your own? Rather than copying stuffs from other sites?

 

[Aussie Team]

All you've done is copied this guys preview and changed a few words

Look mate, I don't know about that forums, I've seen only cricinfo for few information, None other than that site.. And Sorry, I was just trying to impress my work, Once again SOrry

 

[just_cricket]

Mate, it's not impressive to plagarize.

And it's a bit obvious when you've got some good words and phrases but in a sentence they don't make any sense:

It doesn't take any long for the Chappell-Hadlee rivalry to turn fiery and an opening win for the hosts.

I mean, that implies that Chappell Hadlee series always get fiery and the home team always wins the first game. It's clearly not what you mean.

If you post your own words we can help you to improve much like Aditya has done (his story has turned out to be a great one) but if your just going to copy and paste this story's never going to change.

Good luck!

 

[MaD]

This is YOUR story, it's okay to get minor ideas for presentation but if you just copy and paste something, editing a few words, it's not yours and this some one else's story, you shouldn't go around looking for what to write, do it yourself

 

[Varun]

Actually Andrew, they are right. You just read an article and then modified it according to your story. Don't copy anything, no one will like it.

 

[Aussie Team]

V

2nd ODI - New Zealand v Australia at Eden Park, Auckland ​

Morning - 10:35​

Toss - It was Daniel Vettori how won the toss and he'd decided to bat first in this excellent pitch.


With the injure of Lee, Ben Hilfenhaus come's in to replace him in the Line-up. And There have just a change. And New Zealand are without Oram for this game and to replace him Broom pick's up his place in the Line-up.

Morning - 11:00​

The players are ready as-well as umpires and so are we. Lets join the commentary-box, Simon Doull with Ian Chappell. So Welcome to the 2nd ODI Match between Australia (Ian Chappell) and New Zealand (Sir Richard Hadlee).

The Opener's haven't produced any boost as Ryder departs for just (1 runs off 10 balls) in the early 3 over of Bollinger. A confident sweep shot, bringing up the four boundary of the day, And some cheer for the crowds. With some back to back boundaries, Run Rate move's up to 5.57. With some swing's to the right handed Guptill's downfall when for the second time in the series he was caught at cover And with that Bollinger pick's his second wicket of the match. New Zealand 21/2 in 6 overs, Brendon McCullum (11 off 24 balls) with Doug Bollinger (2/8 in 3 overs)

To Be Continued​

 

[ADA]

Good start to the aussies here!! But I want NZ to win!!

 

[Aussie Team]

V

2nd ODI - New Zealand v Australia at Eden Park, Auckland ​

New Zealand were in severe trouble after losing two batsmen in the first six overs and the situation deteriorated further when Taylor departed by the time the score reached 20. The opener Jesse Ryder played toward's Mid on And was Caught out. Bollinger reduced them to 21 for 2 with Guptill's wicket. Operating at around 108kph slower than Hilfenhaus, swung the ball and generally kept a tight line, although when he aimed a wider ball Guptill drove straight to cover where Michael Clarke took a sharp overhead catch.

The miracle working was left to the powerful Batsmen Ross Taylor and Brendon McCullum, but Taylor became Bollinger's Third wicket. New Zealand looked set for a total of around 250 due to a trouble start with Guptill, Ryder and Taylor. But half-century for McCullum, Boosted them to a partnership of about (73).

New Zealand have lost 3 for 21 in eight over but were in charge after racing at almost a run a ball in the middle overs around the mark and needed desperate contributions from McCullum (76 from 75 balls) Was Caught at point as the result he lost his wicket., Styris (38*) and Broom (10*) to prop up a respectable total. , but Parading a new away uniform with a mostly black shirt and gold trousers, the New Zealand looked like lolly shop workers, but McCullum shed any prospect of donations with a 46-ball half-century, which included two sixes, and a 117-run stand with Styris. He arrived in an aggressive mood and his crisp strokeplay was complemented by Styris as he applied a more patient approach and also benefited from two dropped caught's and a couple of tough chances to Ponting.

 

[just_cricket]

New Zealand have lost 3 for 21 in eight over but were in charge after racing at almost a run a ball in the middle overs around the mark and needed desperate contributions from McCullum (76 from 75 balls) Was Caught at point as the result he lost his wicket., Styris (38*) and Broom (10*) to prop up a respectable total. , but Parading a new away uniform with a mostly black shirt and gold trousers, the New Zealand looked like lolly shop workers, but McCullum shed any prospect of donations

Mate you've very obviously taken text again. It's obvious because the Black Caps' kit does not look anything like a lolly shop worker's. And even if it did it would be irrelevant to the story. Some of the sentences don't even make sense and it's obvious you've taken it from here. (The phrase about the 117 run stand is one of the more obvious ones - that's what it says about Ponting & Katich, but in your story the stand between McCullum and Broom looks to be 104).

Because you struggle with English it's obvious when you've copied text - some phrases in the above quote just don't make any sense. It's okay to struggle witrh writing, but you need to improve by doing your own work.

It's fair enough to read an article and take a single phrase which you like, but to more or less copy a whole article or articles, it's just not your work at all.

We (your readers) are happy to help those who find writing difficult, but we'll lose interest if you constantly plagarize.

 

[Aditya]

I agree with JC. Aussieteam try to write whole story on your own rather than copying articles from other sites and posting them here by saying them an “update”. No need to try and write hard words it won't make any difference to the reader. A reader wants the story to be having very least number of grammar mistakes. But if you know meaning of few words which we don't listen often to, then you can surely implement them to this story.

But implementing the words which meaning you don't even know does not make any sense to me. If you have problem with writing then you can obviously take help from anyone who reads your story. Someone like Surendar is always ready to help. Don't be afraid now, we will follow your story if you write this story on your own, if not then I am sorry my friend no one will read this story in future. Choice is yours. You can write this story on your own or copy stuff from other sites. If you want readers to come forward and read this story then write the whole story on your own.