That's why SA are clearly THE NUMBER ONE test side on the planet and the first true number one since the dominance of Australia some 7 years ago.
Have been saying this for years, the only other team that can win away from "home" atm is Pakistan.
That's why SA are clearly THE NUMBER ONE test side on the planet and the first true number one since the dominance of Australia some 7 years ago.
No even they cant (UAE is like a home now,Pakistan Crowd,Pakistan Pitches) and your away record isn't so awesome !Have been saying this for years, the only other team that can win away from "home" atm is Pakistan.
And Indians here can thank us for softening up the Aussies for them.
I`m silently enjoying Pakistan pound this Aussie side. I think a lot of us jumped the gun calling this Australian side right up there with the best when they were yet to be tested anywhere outside of Autralia or Australia like conditions. This side would struggle to win tests anywhere in Asia and have lost 9 tests against India, England and Pakistan in the last year or so. Its as bad as India`s continued struggle in England and Australia.
If these wickets are so easy to bat on, why do non-Asian batsmen struggle so much in these conditions? Its one of the reasons we must start treating runs scored in Asia with some respect.
That's why SA are clearly THE NUMBER ONE test side on the planet and the first true number one since the dominance of Australia some 7 years ago.
Indeed. But to be clear AUS never claimed or boasted to be # 1, even after they won in SA this year. It was the faulty ranking system who stated they were # 1, and AUS coach Lehmann didn't even take the ranking seriously.
ICC news : Australia reclaim No. 1 Test ranking | Cricket News | Cricinfo ICC Site | ESPN Cricinfo
'We're not true No. 1 yet' - Lehmann
- Australia's coach Darren Lehmann does not believe Australia have yet earned the right to call themselves world No. 1 - even if the ICC rankings say so. In Adelaide to speak at a corporate function, Lehmann toldThe Advertiser he wanted the team to prove their quality by sustaining the success of the past six months. "I don't think we're No. 1 until we win a lot of series away from home and at home," he said. "Once we start doing that and spread the gap between No. 1 and No. 2, then you can start calling yourself the genuine No. 1. "We've got to win against Pakistan, the Ashes in England, win at home, win in the West Indies. If we tick off those, then you can pretty much say, 'Yeah, we're No. 1'. But until you do that we're No. 1 in rankings only, if that makes sense. The players understand that. They enjoy being No. 1 but now the challenge is to spread it from one to two. The way you do that is to not lose a game, for starters. Making sure that when we're under the pump in games that we fight hard to get out of it. Almost unbeatable -- that would be the ultimate goal."
- Lehmann's sentiments were echoed by Test opener Chris Rogers, who told Cricket Australia's website the team still had some "unfinished business".
- "I don't know, personally," Rogers said. "Obviously, there's still some unfinished business. Losing 4-0 in India - you can't do that if you're number one - but I think to beat South Africa in South Africa meant a lot. They were number one and to go beat them in their place; I think that is a big achievement."
never said the aussies claimed that, I'm just stating there is a clear gap between SA and everyone else, I think the second tier may consist of Aus, Pak, Eng atm, maybe, maybeeeeee India and then the 3rd tier is the low quality of the Windies and NZ.
Nah you can't have NZ in a 3rd tier based on their form in last 15 months in tests. After SA & AUS, NZ has been the most stable performing test team during that period.