If you are talking about the ones on the leg side, they look absolutely fine....there are numerous situations in real life cricket when that happens....and it happens often. e.g. a 7-2 field favouring off-side, with a short-leg and fine-leg in place, you can take easy twos by hitting the ball on the leg side.
If you are talking about the ones on the leg side, they look absolutely fine....there are numerous situations in real life cricket when that happens....and it happens often. e.g. a 7-2 field favouring off-side, with a short-leg and fine-leg in place, you can take easy twos by hitting the ball on the leg side.
If that was the case, I don't think there would be that many singles on the off side too.If you are talking about the ones on the leg side, they look absolutely fine....there are numerous situations in real life cricket when that happens....and it happens often. e.g. a 7-2 field favouring off-side, with a short-leg and fine-leg in place, you can take easy twos by hitting the ball on the leg side.
3 boundaries isn't too many.Too many boundary deliveries on the Pitch Map. Does it mean, like in other cricket games, Batting is that easy?
If that was the case, I don't think there would be that many singles on the off side too.
Anyways this still remains a concern for me.:/Not really impressed with it, have to say. Along with what whiteninness told, I would like to draw everyone's attention towards yellow lines which seems to cross the boundary and yet depicts 1's along with one white line depicting 2's and 3's. The other 2's and 3's all came near the circle which doesn't look good too.
Post something new, these things are available in the past cricket games..
These is not something's to cheer for
Lol, read the title of the thread...
The field must have changed during the course of the match?
Tbh I think it being issues with manual fielder more likely. He's not played THAT long an innings to have loads of field changes (though again, we don't know context of the match so it's always possible).
Well it was a small observation/criticism and I accept there may be mitigating reasons to invalidate it.
53 of 92 balls you call it a small inning?
53 of 92 balls you call it a small inning?
53 of 92 balls you call it a small inning?