I'm tired of facetious pouting about the laws that clearly few people have actually read.
Looks like someone here was including while making those rules.
Why don't you point it out for us...Einstein.
I'm tired of facetious pouting about the laws that clearly few people have actually read.
Trolling staff, nice.Looks like someone here was including while making those rules.
Why don't you point it out for us...Einstein.
This only seems relevant if you don't read it.For the avoidance of doubt, if an umpire feels that a batsman, in running between the wickets, has significantly changed his direction without probable cause and thereby obstructed a fielder?s attempt to effect a run out, the batsman should, on appeal, be given out, obstructing the field. It shall not be relevant whether a run out would have occurred or not.
At first obstruction seems simple, but there are host of conditions that marginalise it. In bold is a very clear caveat. If you knock the ball with an empty hand it can not become obstructing the field. Finito. Whether your hand is on the bat is important in cricket; it is also not out if you glove a delivery to the keeper in this way.Furthermore, it shall be regarded as obstruction if while the ball is in play either batsman wilfully, and without the consent of a fielder, strikes the ball with his bat or person, other than a hand not holding the bat, after the ball has been touched by a fielder. This shall apply whether or not there is any disadvantage to the fielding side. See 4 below.
This is why these sorts of dismissals are so rare. You don't have to get injured, you just have to avoid it; generally with cricket balls, it's safe to say any time one is hurled at unprotected flesh, it's gonna leave a mark. So to compare with the Inzamam case; hitting the ball with bat to avoid injury = out. Hitting the ball with glove to avoid injury = not out.1. Out Handled the ball(a) Either batsman is out Handled the ball if he wilfully touches the ball while in play with a hand or hands not holding the bat unless he does so with the consent of a fielder.(b) Either batsman is out under this Law if, while the ball is in play, and without the consent of a fielder, he uses his hand or hands not holding the bat to return the ball to any fielder.2. Not out Handled the ball
Notwithstanding 1(a) above, a batsman will not be out under this Law if he handles the ball to avoid injury.