When I first watched the video I was shocked by the bowling action; very deflated to be honest. I did think that if other games that allow full control or actions whilst moving and are extremely smooth such as Fifa and especially the Fight Night series, then why can't this game? Yes, the budget of those games/series are HUGE compared to this, but I didn't understand why it couldn't be as smooth. BUT (and i have no idea why it took so long for this is dawn on me!), this is a bowling action! Something that involves the whole body moving at once, in different directions, in a far more complex way than kicking a ball or throwing a punch - I can now see how much a leap forward this game really is. I suppose I, as others, had exceptionally high expectations and have judged this video as if it was the only cricket game ever made, rather than comparing it to what we've had before...which it outdoes each and every one by a country mile.
Going back to the video briefly, upon re-watching numerous times (probably about fifty) with the knowledge that we the user are in complete control of the bowler from start to finish (and the use of 'blended animation'), it has really grown on me. I genuinely can't wait to play.
I'm not too fussed about graphics (they are certainly better than any other game), I'm more interested in the two main things in cricket, batting and bowling. The thought of being in such control of them is exciting. Very exciting. I'm also not bothered by the smaller things (bats floating etc...) as no game will be perfect, all I care about is that this game is HUGE step forward. Will it work? Who knows. But I am confident it will and will be a great game.
It would be amazing to see gameplay footage of a spinner bowling!
Edit: Would it be possible to answer my question from another thread?
'I'm not sure if this has been answered, so apologies if it has. I have read that catching is manual. Does this apply to the wicketkeeper when a ball is left/missed? Or is it automatic?
If it is automatic when the ball is left/missed, but manual when it comes to catching then surely we'd know when the AI/opponent batsman has edged it, meaning if the umpire gave it not out we'd know to review because we'd know it was edged? If that makes sense?
Any brief description of how the catching system for the wicketkeeper works would be great! Thanks!
If the WK catching is automatic at all times, will they make errors from time to time?'
Thanks.