I would refrain from comparing anything with AC 13. Just because something is better than AC 13 doesn't mean it's great or it's not broken. Even if we compare Graham Gooch cricket from 20+ years ago to AC 13, GC Cricket will win with hands down but the game would still be unacceptable in today's day and age. Comparing stuff with AC 13 serves no purpose whatsoever, especially when folks like Alberts or Madman are providing constructive criticism about DBC 14 and would like nothing better than DBC franchise being a huge success. I'm sure Ross and Big Ant folks are smart enough to figure out which criticism is valid and who are making shit up just for the sake of it. Let's not sweep any criticism of DBC 14 under the carpet coz it's DBC 14.
DBC 14 is a pretty good game but has some issues such as playing shots along the ground, AI field settings, AI fielding & wkt keeping, edges system and AI match awareness. These need to be fixed at the earliest rather than saying everything's wonderful and it's not broken like AC 13 was.