I remember being thankful when his spell was over, didn't help us any though. The way the ODIs are being played right now, keeping a very low econ. rate through out one's alloted overs should deserve a Man of the Match award.andrew_nixon said:He was our most economical bowler in the first ODI too.
Sureshot said:Au contrair? Gyaan Guru.[/QUOTE] ...to The Times of India,a leading Indian daily.
Do not confuse test cricket with ODIs.puddleduck said:Also in the ODI with victory in sight, the English batsman decided that they would practice their sweeps and turned a stroll to victory into a pressure situation and then collapsed. They for all intents and purposes got themselves into the mess and once there India pounced. Do not however construe that as taking anything away from India, throughout that game they showed character and heart. They could easily have collapsed to 150-160 all out, but through Bhaji reached a defendable score. Then with England crusing they could have let their heads drop and go through the motions, but instead kept thinking and when their chances came, they made the most of them.
The luck part comes from being given that chance in the first place, but at the end of the day, Cricket is more often than not about seizing chances when you get them, and India did.
aditya123 said:Do not confuse test cricket with ODIs.
India have been outstanding in the last 20 ODIs consistently winning matches from all situations against top-class oposition while England have only won 2 out of their last 10 ODI matches.,
Their over dependence on bits and pieces cricketers is costing them.
They have to start building up a nucleus for the WC which is just 10 months away and at th moment they do not seem to have the bunch which can win a world cup.
They are depending to much on KP and Freddie.
And what language is that supposed to be?Sureshot said:Au contrair? Gyaan Guru.
aditya123 said:Do not confuse test cricket with ODIs.
India have been outstanding in the last 20 ODIs consistently winning matches from all situations against top-class oposition while England have only won 2 out of their last 10 ODI matches.,
Their over dependence on bits and pieces cricketers is costing them.
They have to start building up a nucleus for the WC which is just 10 months away and at th moment they do not seem to have the bunch which can win a world cup.
They are depending to much on KP and Freddie.
aditya123 said:Do not confuse test cricket with ODIs.
newzolt said:Everyone's waiting for 2nd ODI.Weather seems to be a concern else it's a very even contest.
Ask Sureshot.Could be French though..........sohummisra said:And what language is that supposed to be?