puddleduck
Chairman of Selectors
Machanperu Bala said:Freddie's gone. Solanki has got a once in a life time opportunity to become a fixture in this team.
Except he is, never was, and never will be anywhere near good enough
Machanperu Bala said:Freddie's gone. Solanki has got a once in a life time opportunity to become a fixture in this team.
No one's forgotten your post--it is just that no one agrees with England's policy (who is continuing to bring it up, for example myself). England cannot continue to concentrate their cricket playing around two events (the Ashes and the World Cup). Before the test series, I read one of the English fans writing that it didn't really matter what happened in this series, as it was all just preparation for next year's Ashes. That is absurd thinking, and it is what causes England to get into trouble most of the time.puddleduck said:Sohummisra, you are forgetting my mammoth post from earlier in the thread explaining why England really aren't playing this series with winning it as their main aim.
They are still trying to find their 5th bowler, so that meant giving Mahmood and Plunkett a bowl in the last 10 to see how they handled the pressure situation. They know what Jimmy and Freddie can do, so instead of doing what might serve best at the moment, they did what answers most questions regarding the world cup.
It is why they have continued to play 2 keepers, and still refused to play the 2nd spinner.
sohummisra said:No one's forgotten your post--it is just that no one agrees with England's policy (who is continuing to bring it up, for example myself). England cannot continue to concentrate their cricket playing around two events (the Ashes and the World Cup). Before the test series, I read one of the English fans writing that it didn't really matter what happened in this series, as it was all just preparation for next year's Ashes. That is absurd thinking, and it is what causes England to get into trouble most of the time.
Secondly, I think England are making a huge mistake by telling all their junior and upcoming players the following: "You can do whatever the hell you please, but we have already selected our team for the World Cup." Giving up an ODI series to find a fifth bowler is hardly a fair trade-off. I think it is unfair--even unsportsmanlike--to not play the best XI you can field. And you are treating all the cricketers who have finally got lucky to be on the squad due to injuries like ****.
And finally, interesting stereotype that everyone in the subcontinent considers ODI cricket superior to test cricket, when most of the mature Indian fans on this forum consider the latter to be a greater form of cricket. England, like India, have struggled in alien conditions. And if they want to beat Australia, they certainly need to improve their attitude from "we're missing half our team, we might as well experiment" to "we're missing half our team, but let's see if we can give this hyped-up team a run for their money".
coming from an Indian of which death threats to the players happens, is very hypocritical.
Sureshot said:Treating the newcomers like ****?
Coming from an Indian of which death threats to the players happens, is very hypocritical.
ODIs suck, Tests will always be the priority.
puddleduck said:They care about test cricket and work hard at their games in test cricket. It is only the Odi arena where they experiment. In fact they often use the Odi arena to give a possible test prospect a game or two in the international arena and gain an idea on their temperment before playing a test match. Bottom line is if you are missing 7 out of 11 possible first team players what else is their to do but experiment?
It is not even like you have much of a core of the team or a couple of experienced players to guide them through. It is experimenting, but they have been forced to do so. They do not have any choice in the matter.
Indian fans may not like the fact that England are missing key players, but it is simply fact. Nothing however that India can do about that, and they still have to beat what is in front of them, something they have done with style.
As much as you dislike the stereotype Sohum, and fair enough there are going to be a fair amount of fans in India that like test cricket, you merely have to look at how packed the grounds are for the Odi series to see that the percentage of odi cricket fans in India far outweighs the test cricket fans. I am not saying their is anything wrong with it, it is just a different culture to many of the sides outside the sub-continent and where tests are the most important for teams like England and Australia, the one dayers take precedence in places like India and Pakistan.
Again Zorax, just because they are experimenting does mean they do not think they can be competitive, had all the players given a try turned out to be superstars then noone would say anything, but they are not, and as such England have struggled.
I think the fact that England have moved to 2nd in the test rankings in the last 2 years is more than proof that they are a side that have improved steadily in the test arena. In Odi however they have been pretty poor and no amount of experimenting has altered that. On their day they can beat anyone, as they showed against the Aussies, however more often than not they collapse under pressure.
Oh and since they are running out of time before the World Cup, what is wrong with trying to find out who the 5th bowler will be before it gets too late? India is a great place to find out their temperment in conditions heat wise that will resemble the carribean. Once that fifth bowler is sorted, and the rest of the players have returned for the summer, England will be able to play as close to their full-strenth side as possible for the remaining Odi series.