puddleduck
Chairman of Selectors
That would be hilarious. I think they should do it.
Only issue I have with Nodge winning the FA Youth Cup is that they're celebrating it like it's the bloody World Cup. If they have a parade I will probably die laughing.
Seeing the support he got at the final, he is indeed a god to City fans. Not many managers have managed to get a trophy at City, and that did make Mancini a fan favourite.
And well, I'm with Lee on this issue. The man didn't do a great job, but well, he hardly did a bad job either. He won the title the previous year, and got City close to a trophy this season. And he receives all the stick the moment something goes wrong. Why not blame the players who played like they didn't care for the majority of the season? Or the board who placed pressure on him before the final?
Pellegrini isn't going to work wonders anyway. Wonder what'll happen to him when he has an average season at City.
I'm not too sure if sacking Mancini is the right thing, after thinking about it a bit. Man City have to realise that they're not going to win the league every single year, not with Man Utd, Chelsea and even Arsenal around. Now you have a new man coming in, so you start from scratch all over again instead of building on Mancini's progress.
So from a Utd fan's point of view it's a good thing. Continuity builds success - for that you need look no further than Old Trafford and Sir Alex.
Not at all, I for one as I've said many times before feel managers are over hyped when tesms do well,mand also get to much stick when things go bad where's players escape unscathed.
And I think Chelsea fans who moan about our managers all the time are ridiculous, I don't care if Rafa stays or goes, if it isn't him its only gonna be someone else for a year or 2 then the same old crap will occur
Mancini should have been given more time, simple as that
mancini wasn't doing a very good job.
But that's Sir Alex, Sir Alex the guy who built Manchester United from the ashes almost, and don't even bother arguing that Mancini built our club from the ashes, because he didn't, the Sheikh did.
And what exactly do you think the manager's job is? Put out what he conceives to be the best XI and make 3 very instinctive changes?
----------
Another thing, Mancini wasn't sacked on "1 bad season" alone, he had a terrible relationship with both the hierarchy and the players.
Sir Alex didn't build United from the ashes or anything, they were in the top division, he inherited a squad capable of mid-table/top half finishes.
A manager's job ain't selecting the best XI, it certainly wasn't in the past, but with the power swings now, it certainly seems to be. The thing is, nobody in the press or the society is accepting this.
Sir Alex didn't build United from the ashes or anything, they were in the top division, he inherited a squad capable of mid-table/top half finishes.
Ofc the players are equally to blame, but you can't expect the owner/board to sack the whole squad for 1 man, the manager, and this all ties into power and what not, because all the key figures together(Kompany, Zabaleta, Yaya and Tevez) are always going to out match the manager.
You saw it last year at Chelsea with AVB, you're seeing it now at City with Mancini and you will see it in a few weeks time at Real with Mourinho.
Man City's Samir Nasri 'sad' at Roberto Mancini departure - ESPN FC
At last a player who's sad for Mancini's departure, and ofc, it's Mancini's (ex-)punching bag Nasri.
----------
Manchester City 'plan stadium expansion' - ESPN FC
Does it really cost ?50m for some 6k stands?