karan.kapila
School Cricketer
in the first pic look at the wkeeper ............... he has not taken off the helmett when fast bowler is bowling..... quite unrealistic but funny at the same time
in the background there are two televisions, one showing the Sky coverage of a match in progress, the other showing AC13
in the first pic look at the wkeeper ............... he has not taken off the helmett when fast bowler is bowling..... quite unrealistic but funny at the same time
They didn't.they used the same set of 'core' animations
Why speculate when we know for a fact it is not true?(all speculation though)
I think we've now had the game compared to every other one out there - perhaps its safe to say it is a cricket game?
It's also great that we get pages on end of people talking about how gameplay is so important to them and that they don't care about graphics - a few screenshots get posted and then rage enuses because they never look good enough.
This is the first time I can think of for the first screenshots not being over-processed and totally unrealistic angles. A few people posted the press shots for AC09 and IC10 - the game never looked like that in regular gameplay, because they are taking a shot of cut scenes - this I genuinely believe is real in game shots. I hope that it's just some underpowered PC that is making things look a bit bad around the edges, but I think these are far better than previous games.
My test for this, comes from a press photo we got of Woakes and Chief - in the background there are two televisions, one showing the Sky coverage of a match in progress, the other showing AC13 -
View attachment 108921
I think they've very well captured the look of cricket games from how close they are.
The bat in IC2010 Shots is huge in comparison with the one in AC 13 Screenies.
They didn't.
What part of they cannot use any part of the previous games is so hard to understand? It's not a conspiracy to tell us it is all changed when it isn't, it is literally all new because it has to be, another company owns the rights to all the elements of the previous releases, they cannot use it.
Why speculate when we know for a fact it is not true?
*head explodes*
You have footage of the motion capture session - you really think they would go to the effort of tracking down the same person from at least 4 or 5 years ago (some of their mocap apparently went back to BLIC05, which would have been in development 10 years ago) just to be able to have things look similar to the previous game they don't want to look the same as?And you can have the 'SAME' set of core animations if you get the 'same actor' to do the 'exact same' animations as he did with the previous game!!!
Hahaha... You really think they went out and hired the same guy to perform the EXACT same motion capture because they wanted to replicate similar movements for code they don't legally have ? I've officially heard it all...
You have footage of the motion capture session - you really think they would go to the effort of tracking down the same person from at least 4 or 5 years ago (some of their mocap apparently went back to BLIC05, which would have been in development 10 years ago) just to be able to have things look similar to the previous game they don't want to look the same as?
It's different!
Perhaps because they are the general motions you make when playing cricket?Well there is a general consensus based on that very same motion capture session video that the motions he was doing looked pretty similar to IC2010!!!